Suunto RaceFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 49 mentions across 15 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment61%
PROS 61%
CONS 39%

Rank based on 49 mentions across 15 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want Garmin-level hardware and maps without Garmin's premium price or subscriptions
  • You value a bright AMOLED screen, strong battery life, and simple, refined UI
  • You're a hiker or trail runner who relies heavily on offline maps and route planning

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need dependably accurate wrist heart rate for serious training
  • Turn-by-turn navigation accuracy and reliability are critical to you
  • You want onboard music storage, contactless payments, or deep smartwatch features

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Premium
Exceptional battery lifeRugged, durable build with sapphire glassImproved maps and touchscreen navigationHigh price makes upgrading hard to justifyInconsistent screen visibility on some solar unitsHeart rate sensor bugs
Exceptional battery life
Rugged, durable build with sapphire glass
Improved maps and touchscreen navigation
High price makes upgrading hard to justify
Inconsistent screen visibility on some solar units
Heart rate sensor bugs
2Mid
Always-on displayMeaningful upgrade from older Apple WatchesSolid battery life for an always-on watchNot worth upgrading from Series 4Feels fragile without a caseNeeds nightly charging with always-on enabled
Always-on display
Meaningful upgrade from older Apple Watches
Solid battery life for an always-on watch
Not worth upgrading from Series 4
Feels fragile without a case
Needs nightly charging with always-on enabled
3Mid
Impressive Battery LifeVersatile Fitness Tracking FeaturesGorgeous AMOLED DisplayPrice ConcernsScreen Smudging and ScratchesIssues with Body Composition Measurement
Impressive Battery Life
Versatile Fitness Tracking Features
Gorgeous AMOLED Display
Price Concerns
Screen Smudging and Scratches
Issues with Body Composition Measurement
Best value
4Mid
Excellent Value for PriceGood Heart Rate TrackingLong Battery LifeInconsistent Heart Rate TrackingLimited Storage CapacitySoftware Bugs and Glitches
Excellent Value for Price
Good Heart Rate Tracking
Long Battery Life
Inconsistent Heart Rate Tracking
Limited Storage Capacity
Software Bugs and Glitches
5Budget
Impressive Battery LifeGreat Price-to-Quality RatioLightweight and Comfortable DesignLimited Storage CapacityInaccurate Sleep TrackingFragile Screen
Impressive Battery Life
Great Price-to-Quality Ratio
Lightweight and Comfortable Design
Limited Storage Capacity
Inaccurate Sleep Tracking
Fragile Screen
6Premium
Excellent battery life for ultras
Excellent battery life for ultras
7Budget
Long Battery LifeAccurate Heart Rate MonitoringBuilt-in Alexa FunctionalityBattery Life DiscrepanciesInaccurate Tracking for Some ActivitiesStrap Durability Issues
Long Battery Life
Accurate Heart Rate Monitoring
Built-in Alexa Functionality
Battery Life Discrepancies
Inaccurate Tracking for Some Activities
Strap Durability Issues
8Premium
Excellent battery lifeGreat fit for smaller wristsStrong outdoor sunlight visibilityDim or hard-to-read sapphire displayBulky or heavy feelHigh price for display quality received
Excellent battery life
Great fit for smaller wrists
Strong outdoor sunlight visibility
Dim or hard-to-read sapphire display
Bulky or heavy feel
High price for display quality received
9Mid
Long-term durabilityGreat value for featuresRugged build qualityHeart rate sensor accuracyIndoor display visibility only averageReliability concerns in comparison to newer models
Long-term durability
Great value for features
Rugged build quality
Heart rate sensor accuracy
Indoor display visibility only average
Reliability concerns in comparison to newer models
10Premium
Long battery lifeScratch-proof sapphire glassDetailed sports and training dataHigh priceInconsistent sleep and body battery trackingSapphire screen brightness/visibility concerns
Long battery life
Scratch-proof sapphire glass
Detailed sports and training data
High price
Inconsistent sleep and body battery tracking
Sapphire screen brightness/visibility concerns
You are here
31Mid
Suunto Race
Better value than premium GarminStrong build quality and designBright, high-quality AMOLED displayInconsistent heart rate accuracyMissing smartwatch and music featuresEarly UI lag
Suunto Race
Better value than premium Garmin
Strong build quality and design
Bright, high-quality AMOLED display
Inconsistent heart rate accuracy
Missing smartwatch and music features
Early UI lag

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Switchers from Garmin consistently praise the Race's build quality and value. Numerous commenters who left Garmin, Fenix, Forerunner, or Epix models describe the Race as better-built, better-priced, and free of subscription fees like Garmin Connect+. Several call it the only true Garmin competitor, citing metal hardware, a gorgeous screen, and a refined UI. Regret is a recurring theme, with users wishing they'd switched sooner, and titanium versions are singled out as especially good-looking and premium-feeling.

Heart rate accuracy is the watch's most polarizing feature. Some users report wrist HR matching chest straps almost perfectly across running, swimming, and trail activities, while others describe readings 40-60 bpm too high at rest or complete sensor dropouts mid-workout. Suunto support offered troubleshooting steps that didn't resolve issues for some, and one commenter speculated about a QA gap between watches made in Finland versus China. This inconsistency was enough to make at least two users return the watch entirely.

Maps and navigation draw both strong praise and serious criticism. Many hikers and trail runners love the detailed maps, route planner, and heatmap-based route creation, calling them superior to Garmin's in forested or mountainous terrain. However, others report reduced trail visibility at certain zoom levels after updates, incorrect turn-by-turn directions, unsearchable place names, limited offline map storage, and confusing non-rotating arrows, leading a few to say navigation is unusable or a dealbreaker.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?