Yamaha RX-A2AFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 30 mentions across 14 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment48%
PROS 48%
CONS 52%

Rank based on 30 mentions across 14 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want Aventage sound quality without paying A4A/A6A prices
  • You value MusicCast multi-room and deep web-based PEQ tuning
  • You want a receiver many long-term owners report as trouble-free

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need guaranteed full HDMI 2.1 on all seven inputs
  • You rely on eARC with tight lip-sync or are sensitive to HDR10 banding
  • You want a metal front panel and larger, sharper display

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1
Modern decoding formatsConvenient front-panel S/video accessFlexible speaker configurationMarketing/title inaccuracyPerceived brand decline in receivers
Modern decoding formats
Convenient front-panel S/video access
Flexible speaker configuration
Marketing/title inaccuracy
Perceived brand decline in receivers
Best value
2Mid
Dirac Live room correctionStrong value for priceExcellent Atmos and multichannel sound qualityHistory of HDMI board failures in Onkyo units4-ohm impedance switch pitfallSteep international price disparities
Dirac Live room correction
Strong value for price
Excellent Atmos and multichannel sound quality
History of HDMI board failures in Onkyo units
4-ohm impedance switch pitfall
Steep international price disparities
3Premium
Excellent music and movie sound qualityStrong power delivers 11 independent channelsEffective Audyssey room correction for mixed speakersSubwoofer integration with Audyssey is inconsistent4-ohm speaker load can cause unit failureCriticized power supply and component quality for the price
Excellent music and movie sound quality
Strong power delivers 11 independent channels
Effective Audyssey room correction for mixed speakers
Subwoofer integration with Audyssey is inconsistent
4-ohm speaker load can cause unit failure
Criticized power supply and component quality for the price
4Premium
Excellent long-term sound quality
Excellent long-term sound quality
5Mid
Future-Proof HDMI SupportGood DSP Sound ProgramsGood Price-to-Performance ValueMenu System Criticized by Some
Future-Proof HDMI Support
Good DSP Sound Programs
Good Price-to-Performance Value
Menu System Criticized by Some
6Premium
High-end DACs and XLR outputsLong-term reliabilityBest-in-class control appComplex menu and setupInconsistent subwoofer bass handlingHDMI and setup issues for some users
High-end DACs and XLR outputs
Long-term reliability
Best-in-class control app
Complex menu and setup
Inconsistent subwoofer bass handling
HDMI and setup issues for some users
7Mid
Dirac Live room correctionClear, detailed sound qualityStrong value for the priceBrand reliability concernsHDMI switching and dropout issuesBluetooth headphone switching is manual
Dirac Live room correction
Clear, detailed sound quality
Strong value for the price
Brand reliability concerns
HDMI switching and dropout issues
Bluetooth headphone switching is manual
8Mid
Slim, space-saving form factorBenefits greatly from external power amp via pre-outsWarm, musical Marantz sound signatureLimited power may require an external amp for demanding setupsRuns warmOnly one HDMI port with full 4K/120 HDR support
Slim, space-saving form factor
Benefits greatly from external power amp via pre-outs
Warm, musical Marantz sound signature
Limited power may require an external amp for demanding setups
Runs warm
Only one HDMI port with full 4K/120 HDR support
9Premium
Immersive 360 Spatial Sound MappingClear, Detailed Sound QualityStrong Multichannel PowerDated, Uninspired Chassis DesignDim, Hard-to-Read DisplayNo Phono Input
Immersive 360 Spatial Sound Mapping
Clear, Detailed Sound Quality
Strong Multichannel Power
Dated, Uninspired Chassis Design
Dim, Hard-to-Read Display
No Phono Input
10Mid
Overall positive owner satisfaction8K future-proofingEasy initial setupConfusing speaker/subwoofer setupHarsh highs out of the boxPerceived sound quality decline vs older models
Overall positive owner satisfaction
8K future-proofing
Easy initial setup
Confusing speaker/subwoofer setup
Harsh highs out of the box
Perceived sound quality decline vs older models
You are here
31Mid
Yamaha RX-A2A
Sound quality near flagship Aventage modelsBuild quality and designExtensive web-based EQ adjustabilityHDMI 2.1 port confusionPlastic front panel and small displayAtmos height channel bleed
Yamaha RX-A2A
Sound quality near flagship Aventage models
Build quality and design
Extensive web-based EQ adjustability
HDMI 2.1 port confusion
Plastic front panel and small display
Atmos height channel bleed

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Sound quality rivals pricier Aventage models. Multiple owners who auditioned or owned both the A2A and A4A found the sound nearly indistinguishable, citing identical 10,000uF capacitors and only a slight bass difference from the A4A. One reviewer noted the chipset update after 2021 makes the A2A perform like the A4A to average listeners. Others described the upgrade from older Yamaha or Denon receivers as noticeably warmer, more detailed, and more natural sounding.

HDMI 2.1 and video handling caused real confusion and bugs. Buyers found conflicting information on whether all seven HDMI ports are full 2.1, with Yamaha apparently confirming only the first three are. Separate reports describe HDR10 banding, a hardware update needed for uncompressed 4K120, and one user stuck outputting 1080p instead of 4K despite 4K source content, calling the picture unusable until resolved.

Atmos and eARC issues frustrated some users. One long-term tester found firmware improved Atmos but height channels still bled into the center channel, an issue Yamaha acknowledged and was actively testing. Separate owners reported eARC problems, including no audio passthrough from certain TVs and severe lip-sync delay that optical cables partially fixed, while others had no complaints at all with core audio performance.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?