Yamaha A-S501From real comments

Verdict distilled from 62 mentions across 14 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment79%
PROS 79%
CONS 21%

Rank based on 62 mentions across 14 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want reliable, clean, natural-sounding amplification without breaking the bank
  • You plan to pair it with a wide range of bookshelf or floorstanding speakers, including 4-ohm models
  • You value the flexible Loudness/tone controls and Pure Direct mode for late-night or critical listening

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need a high-end built-in DAC rather than an external one
  • You dislike plastic control knobs and want premium-feeling dials at this price
  • You find the sound 'boring' or lacking timing/engagement compared to livelier amps like some Marantz models

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Mid
Lightweight and gig-friendlyTube-like tone and feelExcellent clean channelExpensive, hard-to-find Tone CapsulesInconsistent or harsh crunch channelNo included footswitch
Lightweight and gig-friendly
Tube-like tone and feel
Excellent clean channel
Expensive, hard-to-find Tone Capsules
Inconsistent or harsh crunch channel
No included footswitch
2Premium
Exceptional tonal versatilityGreat cleanup via guitar volumeBig, huge-sounding tone for its size/wattageDark, bass-heavy voicing for somePrice relative to alternativesRequires volume-knob technique, not true multi-channel
Exceptional tonal versatility
Great cleanup via guitar volume
Big, huge-sounding tone for its size/wattage
Dark, bass-heavy voicing for some
Price relative to alternatives
Requires volume-knob technique, not true multi-channel
Best value
3Mid
Exceptional versatilityGreat with pedals / clean platformLong-term keeper ampCleans not its strongest suitFizzy or excessive gain out of the boxStock preamp tubes considered weak
Exceptional versatility
Great with pedals / clean platform
Long-term keeper amp
Cleans not its strongest suit
Fizzy or excessive gain out of the box
Stock preamp tubes considered weak
4Mid
Detailed, warm sound qualityGood speaker pairing versatilityHEOS streaming and internet radio convenienceAirPlay over Ethernet reliability issueDAC only active via optical/coaxial inputsLacks classic gold Marantz aesthetic
Detailed, warm sound quality
Good speaker pairing versatility
HEOS streaming and internet radio convenience
AirPlay over Ethernet reliability issue
DAC only active via optical/coaxial inputs
Lacks classic gold Marantz aesthetic
5Budget
Powerful for its sizeTonePrint effects built inClean, full, realistic toneAlways-lit tuner displayInsufficient power for loud full bandsSingle effect slot limitation
Powerful for its size
TonePrint effects built in
Clean, full, realistic tone
Always-lit tuner display
Insufficient power for loud full bands
Single effect slot limitation
6Premium
Tight, modern high-gain toneBuilt-in CabClone IR / direct outBuild quality and versatility praised by ownersHigh priceMissing third channel and solo boostNo EL34 as originally expected / power tube gripes
Tight, modern high-gain tone
Built-in CabClone IR / direct out
Build quality and versatility praised by owners
High price
Missing third channel and solo boost
No EL34 as originally expected / power tube gripes
7Mid
Strong power for demanding headphonesCompact, high-quality buildEnjoyable Bluetooth sound qualityEarly sound-mode switching bugLimited single-ended power for some planarsNot fully wireless
Strong power for demanding headphones
Compact, high-quality build
Enjoyable Bluetooth sound quality
Early sound-mode switching bug
Limited single-ended power for some planars
Not fully wireless
8Premium
Exceptional tonal versatilityOwner satisfaction and 'best amp ever' sentimentSmooth, musical high-gain distortionHigh priceOverwhelming number of optionsSome find it too polished or lacking rawness
Exceptional tonal versatility
Owner satisfaction and 'best amp ever' sentiment
Smooth, musical high-gain distortion
High price
Overwhelming number of options
Some find it too polished or lacking rawness
9Mid
Built-in reactive attenuator
Built-in reactive attenuator
10Mid
Great pedal platformLush onboard chorusExceptional clean toneBackground hiss/humWeak onboard distortionSome pedals don't pair well
Great pedal platform
Lush onboard chorus
Exceptional clean tone
Background hiss/hum
Weak onboard distortion
Some pedals don't pair well
You are here
31Mid
Yamaha A-S501
Clean, natural sound signatureStrong value for moneyDrives a wide range of speakers wellCheap-feeling plastic knobsCan sound bright or forward with certain speakersCan sound flat or lacking engagement
Yamaha A-S501
Clean, natural sound signature
Strong value for money
Drives a wide range of speakers well
Cheap-feeling plastic knobs
Can sound bright or forward with certain speakers
Can sound flat or lacking engagement

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Sound quality is consistently called clean, balanced, and natural. Many long-term owners describe the A-S501 as smooth, detailed, and free of harshness, with bass that lets you hear individual notes and a tonal balance many prefer over Marantz, NAD, Rotel, and Cambridge Audio alternatives. Several call it the best amp they've owned for the money, sitting comfortably below far pricier gear like Rega or Naim while still holding its own sonically.

The Loudness control is a distinctive but divisive feature. Yamaha's Loudness dial rolls off mids/highs rather than boosting bass, letting listeners keep full bass current at lower volumes; several owners explain and praise this design once understood. Others find the manual confusing, dislike the resulting v-curve, or simply prefer leaving Pure Direct engaged instead, especially at higher listening levels.

Build quality is rugged, but cosmetic details draw criticism. Multiple commenters emphasize the tank-like weight and construction, reliability over years of use, and near-total absence of heat even when driving 4-ohm speakers hard. However, plastic knobs and square dials feel cheap in use, the built-in DAC is considered only average, and the volume potentiometer is hard to fine-tune at low levels.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?