Warm Audio WA-19From real comments

Verdict distilled from 78 mentions across 12 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment60%
PROS 60%
CONS 40%

Rank based on 78 mentions across 12 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want an affordable alternative to a 57 or e906 for drums and amps
  • You mainly need it for toms or mono overhead use where it's close to the original
  • You're fine applying some EQ to tame the midrange

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need the exact smooth, rounded tone of a vintage AKG D19
  • You're especially sensitive to midrange 'honk' or brightness on snare and hi-hat
  • You're concerned about Warm Audio build/QC consistency

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Budget
Shure Beta 57A~$169 · 1.8× cheaper
Smoother, clearer vocal sound than SM58/SM57Excellent on acoustic guitarDurable, long-lasting buildCan sound harsh in some applicationsAppearance not universally likedInconsistent noise rejection vs SM57
Shure Beta 57A~$169 · 1.8× cheaper
Smoother, clearer vocal sound than SM58/SM57
Excellent on acoustic guitar
Durable, long-lasting build
Can sound harsh in some applications
Appearance not universally liked
Inconsistent noise rejection vs SM57
2Mid
Lewitt MTP W950~$499 · 1.7× pricier
Studio-quality vocal soundMinimal monitor and drum bleedTrusted for regular gig useDistracting large logoHigh price tag
Lewitt MTP W950~$499 · 1.7× pricier
Studio-quality vocal sound
Minimal monitor and drum bleed
Trusted for regular gig use
Distracting large logo
High price tag
Best value
3Mid
Focusrite ISA One~$499 · 1.7× pricier
Adds size and depth to soundFlexible insert and routing optionsVersatile DI sectionDigital I/O card failuresReliability and quality control concernsBuild origin disappointment
Focusrite ISA One~$499 · 1.7× pricier
Adds size and depth to sound
Flexible insert and routing options
Versatile DI section
Digital I/O card failures
Reliability and quality control concerns
Build origin disappointment
4Value
sE Electronics VR1~$299 · similar price
Fat, thick tone on drumsTames harsh cymbals and highsPreferred over condensers as room/overhead micRequires much higher preamp gainCan sound dull as spaced overhead pairPhantom power compatibility uncertainty
sE Electronics VR1~$299 · similar price
Fat, thick tone on drums
Tames harsh cymbals and highs
Preferred over condensers as room/overhead mic
Requires much higher preamp gain
Can sound dull as spaced overhead pair
Phantom power compatibility uncertainty
5Value
sE Electronics DynaCaster~$299 · similar price
Strong overall sound qualityVersatile onboard EQ switchesBuilt-in gain boostHigh price for some buyersUncertain added value over existing setupFiddly dip switches
sE Electronics DynaCaster~$299 · similar price
Strong overall sound quality
Versatile onboard EQ switches
Built-in gain boost
High price for some buyers
Uncertain added value over existing setup
Fiddly dip switches
6Value
Shure KSM137~$399 · 1.3× pricier
Compares favorably to premium micsWarm, natural soundSmooth, non-harsh highsCan sound boomyLess open than top reference micsMids described as 'sour' in one comparison
Shure KSM137~$399 · 1.3× pricier
Compares favorably to premium mics
Warm, natural sound
Smooth, non-harsh highs
Can sound boomy
Less open than top reference mics
Mids described as 'sour' in one comparison
7Budget
AKG D7~$199 · 1.5× cheaper
Warm, full toneOutperforms Shure Beta 58A and D5Shimmering, articulate top endMixed opinion versus D5Not ideal mic placement for instruments like saxSibilance handling weaker than rivals
AKG D7~$199 · 1.5× cheaper
Warm, full tone
Outperforms Shure Beta 58A and D5
Shimmering, articulate top end
Mixed opinion versus D5
Not ideal mic placement for instruments like sax
Sibilance handling weaker than rivals
8Value
Lewitt LCT 440~$299 · similar price
Clean, detailed, low self-noise soundExcellent value for priceHolds up against premium micsToo bright/harsh for some voicesDurability/reliability concernsSingle fixed polar pattern limits flexibility
Lewitt LCT 440~$299 · similar price
Clean, detailed, low self-noise sound
Excellent value for price
Holds up against premium mics
Too bright/harsh for some voices
Durability/reliability concerns
Single fixed polar pattern limits flexibility
9Mid
Electro-Voice RE20~$449 · 1.5× pricier
Smooth, rich, natural soundExcellent background noise rejectionGreat for high-SPL and instrument sourcesInternal foam degrades over timeBulky mount and mediocre shock mountSounds dark or muted for some voices/uses
Electro-Voice RE20~$449 · 1.5× pricier
Smooth, rich, natural sound
Excellent background noise rejection
Great for high-SPL and instrument sources
Internal foam degrades over time
Bulky mount and mediocre shock mount
Sounds dark or muted for some voices/uses
10Budget
Shure SM86~$199 · 1.5× cheaper
Clear, cutting presenceAiry, lively top endSounds clearest / best overall in shootoutsBreath noise without a windscreenCan pick up excess stage bleedDisliked by at least one experienced user
Shure SM86~$199 · 1.5× cheaper
Clear, cutting presence
Airy, lively top end
Sounds clearest / best overall in shootouts
Breath noise without a windscreen
Can pick up excess stage bleed
Disliked by at least one experienced user
You are here
11Value
Warm Audio WA-19~$299
Close vintage match on tomsStrong value for the priceGood performance in a full mixBoosted, honky midrangeNot a true vintage match, sounds different overallThin, plasticy, or harsh character
Warm Audio WA-19~$299
Close vintage match on toms
Strong value for the price
Good performance in a full mix
Boosted, honky midrange
Not a true vintage match, sounds different overall
Thin, plasticy, or harsh character

Who wins on what (similar price)

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

On toms, the WA-19 gets remarkably close to the vintage D19. Numerous commenters singled out toms as the source where the WA-19 and original D19 were hardest to tell apart, sometimes calling them 'pretty indistinguishable' or noting the difference was negligible even in solo listening. Several suggested this makes the WA-19 an easy substitute for close-miking toms, where vintage D19s are often already considered somewhat 'dead' from wear, making the reissue arguably more practical for that specific job.

Snare, hi-hat, and acoustic guitar reveal a brighter, boxier midrange. Many listeners described a spikey or 'honky' upper-midrange around 2-5kHz on the WA-19 that isn't present on the D19, particularly noticeable on snare, cymbals, and acoustic guitar. Some offered specific EQ fixes (cutting around 4.8kHz, adding low end near 60-70Hz) to bring it closer to vintage character, while others simply preferred the AKG's smoother, rounder, more balanced top end and low-mid depth.

Despite tonal differences, most reviewers see strong value for the price. Commenters repeatedly framed the WA-19 as excellent for around $200, calling it a 'no-brainer' compared to buying fragile, expensive vintage originals, and a solid upgrade path from an SM57. Several praised its usability in a full mix, live sound work, and as a mono overhead, even though isolated A/B comparisons often favored the AKG; a smaller group found it thin, plasticy, or harsh regardless of price.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?