Shure KSM137From real comments

Verdict distilled from 23 mentions across 10 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment83%
PROS 83%
CONS 17%

Rank based on 23 mentions across 10 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want a natural, warm tone for acoustic guitar or strings without harsh highs
  • You prefer smooth transients over an ultra-bright, 'brilliant' sound signature
  • You want a small-diaphragm condenser priced more accessibly than reference mics like Schoeps

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need the airiest, most extended high end (the 451 or Schoeps are brighter/more open)
  • You're mixing busy tracks needing a very flat, uncolored reference sound
  • You dislike any hint of boominess, which a couple of listeners noted at times

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Premium
Lewitt MTP W950
Studio-quality vocal soundMinimal monitor and drum bleedTrusted for regular gig useDistracting large logoHigh price tag
Lewitt MTP W950
Studio-quality vocal sound
Minimal monitor and drum bleed
Trusted for regular gig use
Distracting large logo
High price tag
2Premium
Sennheiser MKH 8040
High Owner SatisfactionExceptional Sound ClarityGreat for Field RecordingHigh PriceNot Omnidirectional / More MuffledUltrasonic Self-Noise & Wind Rumble
Sennheiser MKH 8040
High Owner Satisfaction
Exceptional Sound Clarity
Great for Field Recording
High Price
Not Omnidirectional / More Muffled
Ultrasonic Self-Noise & Wind Rumble
3Premium
Sennheiser AVX
Reliable, plug-and-play operationClean, distortion-free audioSolid build quality
Sennheiser AVX
Reliable, plug-and-play operation
Clean, distortion-free audio
Solid build quality
4Premium
Lewitt LCT 640
Post-recording pattern flexibilityVersatile across instrumentsStrong, non-boomy low endPrice barrier for some buyersUnclear M/S and connector design questionsLacking low-mid presence on some vocals
Lewitt LCT 640
Post-recording pattern flexibility
Versatile across instruments
Strong, non-boomy low end
Price barrier for some buyers
Unclear M/S and connector design questions
Lacking low-mid presence on some vocals
5Mid
sE Electronics DynaCaster
Strong overall sound qualityVersatile onboard EQ switchesBuilt-in gain boostHigh price for some buyersUncertain added value over existing setupFiddly dip switches
sE Electronics DynaCaster
Strong overall sound quality
Versatile onboard EQ switches
Built-in gain boost
High price for some buyers
Uncertain added value over existing setup
Fiddly dip switches
6Mid
Shure Beta 57A
Smoother, clearer vocal sound than SM58/SM57Excellent on acoustic guitarDurable, long-lasting buildCan sound harsh in some applicationsAppearance not universally likedInconsistent noise rejection vs SM57
Shure Beta 57A
Smoother, clearer vocal sound than SM58/SM57
Excellent on acoustic guitar
Durable, long-lasting build
Can sound harsh in some applications
Appearance not universally liked
Inconsistent noise rejection vs SM57
7Mid
Sennheiser MD 441
Excellent sound on drums and vocalsStriking, attractive designRecognizable, notable reputation
Sennheiser MD 441
Excellent sound on drums and vocals
Striking, attractive design
Recognizable, notable reputation
8Premium
Telefunken ELA M 251
Smooth, warm characterCompetitive with top-tier micsFull-bodied, rich low endHard to distinguish from cheaper alternativesVery high pricePositioning-sensitive
Telefunken ELA M 251
Smooth, warm character
Competitive with top-tier mics
Full-bodied, rich low end
Hard to distinguish from cheaper alternatives
Very high price
Positioning-sensitive
9Premium
MXL V69M
Rivals the Neumann U67Warm, creamy tube toneAttractive appearance
MXL V69M
Rivals the Neumann U67
Warm, creamy tube tone
Attractive appearance
Best value
10Mid
Neumann TLM 193
Natural, unhyped tonePreferred over U87ai in blind testsLow sibilance / smooth highsAudible distortion noted at price pointCan sound muddy or bass-heavyCardioid-only, unlike multi-pattern siblings
Neumann TLM 193
Natural, unhyped tone
Preferred over U87ai in blind tests
Low sibilance / smooth highs
Audible distortion noted at price point
Can sound muddy or bass-heavy
Cardioid-only, unlike multi-pattern siblings
You are here
18Mid
Shure KSM137
Compares favorably to premium micsWarm, natural soundSmooth, non-harsh highsCan sound boomyLess open than top reference micsMids described as 'sour' in one comparison
Shure KSM137
Compares favorably to premium mics
Warm, natural sound
Smooth, non-harsh highs
Can sound boomy
Less open than top reference mics
Mids described as 'sour' in one comparison

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Listeners consistently describe the KSM137 as warm and natural sounding. Multiple commenters across different shootout videos call the KSM137 warm, balanced, and 'real' sounding, often placing it just behind the reference-standard Schoeps mics. One noted a sweeter low-string response, another said it doesn't impose distracting colorations, and several ranked it above brighter mics like the AKG 451 and Rode NT5 for realistic acoustic guitar tone.

The mic avoids harsh or plastic-y high frequencies that some competitors exhibit. Several users specifically praised the KSM137 for not producing the upper-high 'plasticky' frequency common in other condensers, even the Neumanns, making it feel smooth and versatile across different acoustic guitars. One user said it wasn't pre-EQ'ed or harsh, just realistic, while another noted smooth transients that don't sound brittle, unlike some higher-fidelity alternatives.

Some found it slightly boomy or too soft-mid focused compared to flatter mics. Not every comparison was fully positive: one reviewer felt the KSM137 was 'a little too boomy at times' next to the SM81 and KM184, and another humorously described the SM81 and KSM137 as 'sour in the mids.' These comments suggest the KSM137's warmth can occasionally read as less neutral than flatter reference options like the SM81 or Schoeps.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?