ViewSonic XG2737From real comments

Verdict distilled from 20 mentions across 8 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment13%
PROS 12%
CONS 88%

Rank based on 20 mentions across 8 aspects

View the verdict as

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You don't have a GPU capable of pushing close to 500+ fps, since commenters say most systems can't use 520Hz anyway
  • You want sharper-than-1080p detail on a 27in screen - several viewers call FHD at this size low-res and eye-straining
  • You're price-sensitive - commenters say the roughly 40,000 TL cost is better spent on an OLED or mini-LED monitor

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Mid
Exceptional motion clarity
Exceptional motion clarity
2Mid
240Hz competitive advantage
240Hz competitive advantage
3Premium
Exceptional Pixel Density and ClarityIdeal 27-inch Size Sweet SpotHigh Overall SatisfactionUnreliable Proximity Sensor BehaviorDSC Black Screen and Flicker IssuesBurn-in Concerns for Heavy Desktop Use
Exceptional Pixel Density and Clarity
Ideal 27-inch Size Sweet Spot
High Overall Satisfaction
Unreliable Proximity Sensor Behavior
DSC Black Screen and Flicker Issues
Burn-in Concerns for Heavy Desktop Use
4Premium
Deep OLED blacks and image qualityMatte coating suits bright roomsBuilt-in speakersHigh priceMatte coating criticized by someNo burn-in warranty
Deep OLED blacks and image quality
Matte coating suits bright rooms
Built-in speakers
High price
Matte coating criticized by some
No burn-in warranty
Best value
5Budget
Affordable Price180Hz Refresh RateIPS Panel AppealEdge Image Cutoff
Affordable Price
180Hz Refresh Rate
IPS Panel Appeal
Edge Image Cutoff
6Premium
DyAc/DyAc+ strobing technologyExcellent for competitive FPS titlesNear-CRT motion clarityLimiting 1080p resolutionHarsh matte anti-glare coatingHigh price increase over predecessor
DyAc/DyAc+ strobing technology
Excellent for competitive FPS titles
Near-CRT motion clarity
Limiting 1080p resolution
Harsh matte anti-glare coating
High price increase over predecessor
7Budget
Affordable PriceGreat For Console Gaming200Hz Achievable Via HDMIDisplayPort Signal Issue At 200Hz
Affordable Price
Great For Console Gaming
200Hz Achievable Via HDMI
DisplayPort Signal Issue At 200Hz
8Mid
Owners Consider It Their Best MonitorStrong Value, Especially via RebrandExcellent IPS Image QualityWeak Contrast Ratio & IPS GlowScreen Flicker IssuesAwkward OSD & Port Placement
Owners Consider It Their Best Monitor
Strong Value, Especially via Rebrand
Excellent IPS Image Quality
Weak Contrast Ratio & IPS Glow
Screen Flicker Issues
Awkward OSD & Port Placement
9Premium
Mini LED Display QualityOverall Positive Ownership ExperienceStrong Built-in SpeakersHDR and Dimming Firmware IssuesLimited Resolution OptionsSlow Wake From Sleep
Mini LED Display Quality
Overall Positive Ownership Experience
Strong Built-in Speakers
HDR and Dimming Firmware Issues
Limited Resolution Options
Slow Wake From Sleep
10Premium
DisplayPort 2.1 future-proofingVibrant QD-OLED color and HDR qualityStrong upgrade satisfaction and value vs competitorsPrice premium and value debatessRGB mode and black crush issuesVRR/OLED flicker
DisplayPort 2.1 future-proofing
Vibrant QD-OLED color and HDR quality
Strong upgrade satisfaction and value vs competitors
Price premium and value debates
sRGB mode and black crush issues
VRR/OLED flicker
You are here
31Premium
ViewSonic XG2737
Extremely High Refresh RateHigh Price Versus Panel TypeLow-Resolution 27in Full HD PanelOverkill, Hard-to-Utilize Refresh Rate
ViewSonic XG2737
Extremely High Refresh Rate
High Price Versus Panel Type
Low-Resolution 27in Full HD Panel
Overkill, Hard-to-Utilize Refresh Rate

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Commenters question whether 520Hz is actually usable. Multiple viewers argue that 520Hz is overkill, noting that very few games and even fewer PC setups can maintain frame rates anywhere near that number. One commenter says 180Hz is already plenty for gaming and 120-144Hz is smooth for work, while another calls high-Hz marketing a way to push GPU sales rather than deliver real benefit, especially without a strong enough system to feed the panel.

Pricing draws consistent pushback from viewers. Several commenters focus on the roughly 40,000 TL price tag, arguing it is too high for an IPS panel using 6bit+FRC color rather than newer-generation IPS tech. Multiple viewers say they would rather buy an OLED or mini-LED monitor at a similar price point, and one recalls panel failures on other ViewSonic monitors after the warranty period ended, further souring their view of the value proposition.

The 27in Full HD combination is seen as a mismatch for the target buyer. Viewers argue that 27-inch Full HD produces a pixel pitch too large for comfortable viewing, causing eye strain, and that serious buyers should look at 1440p instead. Others state plainly that no competitive esports player would choose a 27-inch monitor, questioning who the panel is actually designed for, while another calls it unnecessarily expensive for both esports and casual gamers alike.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?