Pioneer PLX-500From real comments

Verdict distilled from 39 mentions across 13 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment59%
PROS 59%
CONS 41%

Rank based on 39 mentions across 13 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want a heavy, solid direct-drive table mainly for home vinyl listening
  • You're fine upgrading the stock slipmat/cartridge for better performance
  • You want a cheaper alternative to the PLX-1000/Technics 1200 with similar core sound

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need serious club-level scratching torque and durability
  • You want a cartridge/headshell that aligns properly with Concorde carts out of the box
  • You're sensitive to price and see similarly-priced rivals as better built

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Mid
Excellent CD playback qualityAdjustable sound settings for tuningLong-term reliabilityNo SACD supportPerceived poor value by one userSlow streaming performance
Excellent CD playback quality
Adjustable sound settings for tuning
Long-term reliability
No SACD support
Perceived poor value by one user
Slow streaming performance
2Premium
Distraction-free listening experienceSuperior sound quality vs rivalsGood headphone/IEM pairing optionsEU volume/sound cap restrictionsNo wireless/Android limits convenienceHigh price point
Distraction-free listening experience
Superior sound quality vs rivals
Good headphone/IEM pairing options
EU volume/sound cap restrictions
No wireless/Android limits convenience
High price point
3Mid
Reliable top-loading mechanism
Reliable top-loading mechanism
4
Attractive DesignAuto-Reverse PlaybackBeautiful Sound QualityLeft Channel Warm-Up Delay
Attractive Design
Auto-Reverse Playback
Beautiful Sound Quality
Left Channel Warm-Up Delay
5Mid
Extremely durable buildExcellent sound qualityEasy tape threadingCounter belt failure is commonAging capacitors and transistors cause noiseRear-mounted output controls
Extremely durable build
Excellent sound quality
Easy tape threading
Counter belt failure is common
Aging capacitors and transistors cause noise
Rear-mounted output controls
6Premium
Premium Build QualityStrong Predecessor Track RecordLong-Term DurabilitySkepticism Over Gold/Material Marketing ClaimsVery High PriceUncertain Volume Cap and Storage Features
Premium Build Quality
Strong Predecessor Track Record
Long-Term Durability
Skepticism Over Gold/Material Marketing Claims
Very High Price
Uncertain Volume Cap and Storage Features
7Premium
Powerful amplificationBalanced, neutral sound qualityAcceptable size for the power deliveredVery large and heavyHeat during useHigh price
Powerful amplification
Balanced, neutral sound quality
Acceptable size for the power delivered
Very large and heavy
Heat during use
High price
8Mid
Clear, detailed soundESS DAC still sounds goodUSB FLAC/WAV playbackUndisclosed DAC chip swapCheaper build vs 40n seriesDesign not for everyone
Clear, detailed sound
ESS DAC still sounds good
USB FLAC/WAV playback
Undisclosed DAC chip swap
Cheaper build vs 40n series
Design not for everyone
9Premium
Rich, Balanced SoundAttractive DesignPremium Build QualityControversial Straight Tonearm GeometryHigh PriceFinish Not Metal
Rich, Balanced Sound
Attractive Design
Premium Build Quality
Controversial Straight Tonearm Geometry
High Price
Finish Not Metal
Best value
10Mid
Strong value for moneyConvenient headshell-mounted optionExcellent tracking on older vinylBright red stylus color criticizedQuestionable review test conditions
Strong value for money
Convenient headshell-mounted option
Excellent tracking on older vinyl
Bright red stylus color criticized
Questionable review test conditions
You are here
31Mid
Pioneer PLX-500
Strong sound quality for the priceGood value versus DJ and home decks alikeHeavy, solid buildTonearm leveling issuesSensitive to room vibration and audio feedbackTouchy or non-functional anti-skate
Pioneer PLX-500
Strong sound quality for the price
Good value versus DJ and home decks alike
Heavy, solid build
Tonearm leveling issues
Sensitive to room vibration and audio feedback
Touchy or non-functional anti-skate

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Sound quality impresses many once the stock components are upgraded. Multiple long-term owners describe the PLX-500 as sonically close to the Technics 1200 mk2 and even the pricier PLX-1000, especially with a better mat (rubber, acrylic, or Technics MKII mat) or cartridge like the Nagaoka MP-110 or Ortofon 2M. Some call it dead silent and accurate in speed. Others note the stock slipmat and AT91-style cartridge hold it back initially but are serviceable once broken in or swapped.

Build quality is solid but shows some compromises versus higher-end decks. Users describe it as heavy and well made, with a cast aluminium headshell and good vibration-dampened feet. However, the top and bottom panels are plastic, the platter isn't part of the motor assembly like on Technics units, and it's noted as more prone to picking up room audio feedback and rumble than pricier turntables, especially with the dust cover open.

Setup quirks around VTA, overhang, and anti-skate frustrate several buyers. Multiple commenters report the tonearm isn't level at the lowest VTA setting even following instructions, sometimes requiring shims, washers, or thicker mats to fix. Others flag a non-standard headshell overhang (53-54mm) that misaligns Concorde-style cartridges. The anti-skate adjustment is described as touchy or not working properly by several users, and one noted the tonearm drop isn't damped.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?