Marantz Model 60nFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 26 mentions across 12 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment29%
PROS 29%
CONS 71%

Rank based on 26 mentions across 12 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want an all-in-one amp with built-in HEOS streaming and HDMI ARC
  • Your speakers are efficient and don't need more than 60W per channel
  • You're upgrading from an older AVR or entry-level Marantz and want better imaging and power

What users love

Skip this if...

  • Your speakers demand more than 60-80W per channel of headroom
  • You want eARC, higher power, or Japan-built construction like the M1 or 40n
  • You're put off by Marantz's confusingly similar model lineup and prefer a simpler choice like the M1

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Mid
Lightweight and gig-friendlyTube-like tone and feelExcellent clean channelExpensive, hard-to-find Tone CapsulesInconsistent or harsh crunch channelNo included footswitch
Lightweight and gig-friendly
Tube-like tone and feel
Excellent clean channel
Expensive, hard-to-find Tone Capsules
Inconsistent or harsh crunch channel
No included footswitch
2Premium
Exceptional tonal versatilityGreat cleanup via guitar volumeBig, huge-sounding tone for its size/wattageDark, bass-heavy voicing for somePrice relative to alternativesRequires volume-knob technique, not true multi-channel
Exceptional tonal versatility
Great cleanup via guitar volume
Big, huge-sounding tone for its size/wattage
Dark, bass-heavy voicing for some
Price relative to alternatives
Requires volume-knob technique, not true multi-channel
Best value
3Mid
Exceptional versatilityGreat with pedals / clean platformLong-term keeper ampCleans not its strongest suitFizzy or excessive gain out of the boxStock preamp tubes considered weak
Exceptional versatility
Great with pedals / clean platform
Long-term keeper amp
Cleans not its strongest suit
Fizzy or excessive gain out of the box
Stock preamp tubes considered weak
4Mid
Detailed, warm sound qualityGood speaker pairing versatilityHEOS streaming and internet radio convenienceAirPlay over Ethernet reliability issueDAC only active via optical/coaxial inputsLacks classic gold Marantz aesthetic
Detailed, warm sound quality
Good speaker pairing versatility
HEOS streaming and internet radio convenience
AirPlay over Ethernet reliability issue
DAC only active via optical/coaxial inputs
Lacks classic gold Marantz aesthetic
5Budget
Powerful for its sizeTonePrint effects built inClean, full, realistic toneAlways-lit tuner displayInsufficient power for loud full bandsSingle effect slot limitation
Powerful for its size
TonePrint effects built in
Clean, full, realistic tone
Always-lit tuner display
Insufficient power for loud full bands
Single effect slot limitation
6Premium
Tight, modern high-gain toneBuilt-in CabClone IR / direct outBuild quality and versatility praised by ownersHigh priceMissing third channel and solo boostNo EL34 as originally expected / power tube gripes
Tight, modern high-gain tone
Built-in CabClone IR / direct out
Build quality and versatility praised by owners
High price
Missing third channel and solo boost
No EL34 as originally expected / power tube gripes
7Mid
Strong power for demanding headphonesCompact, high-quality buildEnjoyable Bluetooth sound qualityEarly sound-mode switching bugLimited single-ended power for some planarsNot fully wireless
Strong power for demanding headphones
Compact, high-quality build
Enjoyable Bluetooth sound quality
Early sound-mode switching bug
Limited single-ended power for some planars
Not fully wireless
8Premium
Exceptional tonal versatilityOwner satisfaction and 'best amp ever' sentimentSmooth, musical high-gain distortionHigh priceOverwhelming number of optionsSome find it too polished or lacking rawness
Exceptional tonal versatility
Owner satisfaction and 'best amp ever' sentiment
Smooth, musical high-gain distortion
High price
Overwhelming number of options
Some find it too polished or lacking rawness
9Mid
Built-in reactive attenuator
Built-in reactive attenuator
10Mid
Great pedal platformLush onboard chorusExceptional clean toneBackground hiss/humWeak onboard distortionSome pedals don't pair well
Great pedal platform
Lush onboard chorus
Exceptional clean tone
Background hiss/hum
Weak onboard distortion
Some pedals don't pair well
You are here
31Mid
Marantz Model 60n
Built-in HEOS streaming has improvedHDMI ARC and pre-amp outs includedAppeals to TV plus 2-channel audio usersConfusing overlap with other Marantz modelsPower may be insufficient for some speakersSeen as overpriced for what it offers
Marantz Model 60n
Built-in HEOS streaming has improved
HDMI ARC and pre-amp outs included
Appeals to TV plus 2-channel audio users
Confusing overlap with other Marantz models
Power may be insufficient for some speakers
Seen as overpriced for what it offers

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Many owners find the 60n a clear upgrade in sound quality and convenience over older gear. Users moving from AVRs like the NR1608 or NL1200, or from the PM7000N, describe a drastic leap in audio quality, power, and imaging when driving efficient speakers such as Paradigm SE6000f. One buyer who got it on an open-box deal was happy with the price-to-performance tradeoff versus the Model 50 and Yamaha AS801. Built-in streaming meant not needing a separate streamer box, which several saw as good value.

Power and build quality draw real skepticism from several commenters. Some feel 60W/ch is weak for hungrier speakers needing 80W or more, and one commenter compares it unfavorably to the NR1200, claiming components strain at higher volumes. Another notes the 60n is manufactured in Vietnam while the M1 and 40n are made in Japan, seen as a quality signal. Distortion at high volume is mentioned as a recurring Marantz-line issue, not unique to this model.

The lineup overlap with the M1, Model 50, and Stereo 70S undermines confidence in the 60n specifically. Multiple commenters call Marantz's five-plus similar-looking amps confusing, comparing the buying experience to 'paradox of choice' or a chaotic restaurant menu. Some explicitly say they'd choose the M1 over the 60n at this price point, or prefer the Model 50 with a separate streamer for more flexibility. This uncertainty about differentiation seems to be the biggest barrier to recommending the 60n outright.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?