Lewitt MTP 340From real comments

Name: Lewitt MTP 340
Rating: 3 (10 reviews)

Verdict distilled from 10 mentions across 8 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment60%

PROS 60%

CONS 40%

Rank based on 10 mentions across 8 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

You want a clear, vocal-focused handheld condenser sound
You're shopping on a tight budget and value a low price
You don't need strong low-end response from the mic

What users love

Clear Vocal Presence0 mentions

Widely praised

Pleasant, Inoffensive Sound0 mentions

Generally positive

Affordable Price0 mentions

Strongly positive

Condenser Tone in Handheld Body0 mentions

Widely praised

Skip this if...

You need a handheld condenser with rich, deep lows
You want distinctly different-sounding polar pattern settings
You expect an included windscreen out of the box

What users complain about

Thin Low End0 mentions

Generally negative

Similar Polar Pattern Settings0 mentions

Generally negative

Not Everyone's Preferred Sound0 mentions

Generally negative

Windscreen Not Included0 mentions

Mildly negative

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice

1Budget

Shure Beta 57A~$169 · 1.2× cheaper

Smoother, clearer vocal sound than SM58/SM57Excellent on acoustic guitarDurable, long-lasting buildCan sound harsh in some applicationsAppearance not universally likedInconsistent noise rejection vs SM57

Shure Beta 57A~$169 · 1.2× cheaper

Smoother, clearer vocal sound than SM58/SM57

Excellent on acoustic guitar

Durable, long-lasting build

Can sound harsh in some applications

Appearance not universally liked

Inconsistent noise rejection vs SM57

2Value

sE Electronics VR1~$299 · 1.5× pricier

Fat, thick tone on drumsTames harsh cymbals and highsPreferred over condensers as room/overhead micRequires much higher preamp gainCan sound dull as spaced overhead pairPhantom power compatibility uncertainty

sE Electronics VR1~$299 · 1.5× pricier

Fat, thick tone on drums

Tames harsh cymbals and highs

Preferred over condensers as room/overhead mic

Requires much higher preamp gain

Can sound dull as spaced overhead pair

Phantom power compatibility uncertainty

3Value

sE Electronics DynaCaster~$299 · 1.5× pricier

Strong overall sound qualityVersatile onboard EQ switchesBuilt-in gain boostHigh price for some buyersUncertain added value over existing setupFiddly dip switches

sE Electronics DynaCaster~$299 · 1.5× pricier

Strong overall sound quality

Versatile onboard EQ switches

Built-in gain boost

High price for some buyers

Uncertain added value over existing setup

Fiddly dip switches

Best value

4Budget

Audio-Technica AT2035~$149 · 1.3× cheaper

Big upgrade over AT2020Versatile for vocals and instrumentsGreat value versus pricier micsNoise and setup issues reported by someRequires additional gearMuffled or distorted sound without proper setup

Audio-Technica AT2035~$149 · 1.3× cheaper

Big upgrade over AT2020

Versatile for vocals and instruments

Great value versus pricier mics

Noise and setup issues reported by some

Requires additional gear

Muffled or distorted sound without proper setup

5Budget

AKG D7~$199 · similar price

Warm, full toneOutperforms Shure Beta 58A and D5Shimmering, articulate top endMixed opinion versus D5Not ideal mic placement for instruments like saxSibilance handling weaker than rivals

AKG D7~$199 · similar price

Warm, full tone

Outperforms Shure Beta 58A and D5

Shimmering, articulate top end

Mixed opinion versus D5

Not ideal mic placement for instruments like sax

Sibilance handling weaker than rivals

6Value

Lewitt LCT 440~$299 · 1.5× pricier

Clean, detailed, low self-noise soundExcellent value for priceHolds up against premium micsToo bright/harsh for some voicesDurability/reliability concernsSingle fixed polar pattern limits flexibility

Lewitt LCT 440~$299 · 1.5× pricier

Clean, detailed, low self-noise sound

Excellent value for price

Holds up against premium mics

Too bright/harsh for some voices

Durability/reliability concerns

Single fixed polar pattern limits flexibility

7Budget

AKG D5 S~$109 · 1.8× cheaper

Vocal clarityFeedback and off-axis rejectionGreat value for priceExaggerated high frequenciesLow output on some interfacesAppearance

AKG D5 S~$109 · 1.8× cheaper

Vocal clarity

Feedback and off-axis rejection

Great value for price

Exaggerated high frequencies

Low output on some interfaces

Appearance

8Budget

Shure SM86~$199 · similar price

Clear, cutting presenceAiry, lively top endSounds clearest / best overall in shootoutsBreath noise without a windscreenCan pick up excess stage bleedDisliked by at least one experienced user

Shure SM86~$199 · similar price

Clear, cutting presence

Airy, lively top end

Sounds clearest / best overall in shootouts

Breath noise without a windscreen

Can pick up excess stage bleed

Disliked by at least one experienced user

You are here

9Budget

Lewitt MTP 340~$199

Clear Vocal PresencePleasant, Inoffensive SoundAffordable PriceNot Everyone's Preferred SoundSimilar Polar Pattern SettingsThin Low End

Lewitt MTP 340~$199

Clear Vocal Presence

Pleasant, Inoffensive Sound

Affordable Price

Not Everyone's Preferred Sound

Similar Polar Pattern Settings

Thin Low End

Versatile
1. Audio-Technica AT2035arrow_upward8
2. Lewitt LCT 440arrow_upward6
Value for money
1. Audio-Technica AT2035arrow_upward6
2. AKG D5 Sarrow_upward5
Vocal clarity
1. Shure Beta 57Aarrow_upward9
2. Lewitt MTP 340arrow_upward2
Low self noise
1. Lewitt LCT 440arrow_upward6
2. Audio-Technica AT2035arrow_upward4
Feedback rejection
1. AKG D5 Sarrow_upward5
2. Shure Beta 57Aarrow_upward4
Durability
1. AKG D5 Sarrow_upward4
2. Shure Beta 57Aarrow_upward4

Overall Impression

Sound leans clear and vocal-forward, with limited deep lows. Commenters consistently describe the MTP 340 as sitting more in the vocal range than delivering the deep lows typically expected from condenser mics. One listener wondered how it would perform on instruments or guitar cabs given this tendency. Another called it not quite their preferred sound but noted it offers strong clarity, making it a good fit for someone who prioritizes detail over low-end weight in a handheld condenser.

Overall character is inoffensive rather than exciting. One tester compared the 90 and 180 degree settings and found them sounding largely the same, and described a keyboard test as unremarkable. Their overall take was that the mic is not bad and not very offensive, suggesting a safe, usable sound rather than a standout one. A separate commenter, already a fan of Lewitt's house sound from other models, liked the general concept behind this handheld condenser design.

Price is the mic's clearest selling point. A commenter called the MTP 340 a steal at twenty dollars, framing it as strong value for the price. They specifically recommended adding an inexpensive windscreen accessory to round out the package, implying the mic doesn't come with one included. This combination of low cost and easy accessory upgrade positions it as a budget-friendly option for those wanting a handheld condenser without a big investment.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?

record_voice_overClear Vocal Presence

2 mentions

Widely praised

Listeners note the mic leans into the vocal range with notable clarity. One commenter said it would suit someone who really likes a lot of clarity in their recordings.

@enriquekahn9405

Not the sound I look for in a mic but really nice otherwise. This would be pretty good for someone who really likes a lot of clarity.

smart_display

March 16, 2021

@jkthroway6579

Not unpleasant sounding. Definitely more in the vocal range, I don't hear as much of the deep lows that you typically catch with condensers. I wonder how this would sound on instruments/guitar cabs.

smart_display

March 16, 2021

thumb_upPleasant, Inoffensive Sound

2 mentions

Generally positive

One tester summarized the overall sound as not bad and not very offensive, indicating a safe, usable tone. Another fan of the Lewitt brand's sound found the concept appealing overall.

@atalkspodcasting

I have a special place for handheld condensers in my life tbh😆 I just love the idea of a condenser sound in a dynamic body, I just ordered the 350 CM which I believe is tge successor to this guy and I really like the Lewitt sound (got their LCT 240 & 440 already) and the 350 came in as a nice new alternative for travelling around with one of the condenser handhelds, just the only one thing bugging me is the huge HP which can be seen on the frequency response graph, I am worried if it can be lacking in the low end too much or sound really shiny, but its a gamble! also there are very few reviews on that thing, so this was great! Thanks Bark!

smart_display

November 27, 2021

@ellisgl

IMO: 90 and 180 sound the same. The keyboard test, meh. Over all not bad, not very offensive at all.

smart_display

March 16, 2021

attach_moneyAffordable Price

1 mentions

Strongly positive

A commenter called the MTP 340 a steal at twenty dollars, highlighting strong value for money. This low price point makes it an accessible entry into handheld condenser microphones.

@TheOuthousePhilosopher

Great pickup. $20 is a steal. But their $7.99 windscreen and you’ve got a winner.

smart_display

March 16, 2021

micCondenser Tone in Handheld Body

1 mentions

Widely praised

A commenter expressed enthusiasm for the idea of condenser sound packed into a handheld dynamic-style body, citing prior positive experience with other Lewitt mics like the LCT 240 and 440.

@atalkspodcasting

smart_display

November 27, 2021

graphic_eqThin Low End

1 mentions

Generally negative

A commenter noted they didn't hear as much deep low end as they typically expect from condenser microphones. This makes the mic feel more vocal-focused than full-range.

@jkthroway6579

Not unpleasant sounding. Definitely more in the vocal range, I don't hear as much of the deep lows that you typically catch with condensers. I wonder how this would sound on instruments/guitar cabs.

smart_display

March 16, 2021

tuneSimilar Polar Pattern Settings

1 mentions

Generally negative

One tester found that the 90 and 180 degree settings sounded largely the same, suggesting limited practical difference between the mic's polar pattern options.

@ellisgl

IMO: 90 and 180 sound the same. The keyboard test, meh. Over all not bad, not very offensive at all.

smart_display

March 16, 2021

thumb_downNot Everyone's Preferred Sound

1 mentions

Generally negative

A commenter stated the sound wasn't quite what they personally look for in a microphone, even while acknowledging it was otherwise nice and clear.

@enriquekahn9405

Not the sound I look for in a mic but really nice otherwise. This would be pretty good for someone who really likes a lot of clarity.

smart_display

March 16, 2021

warningWindscreen Not Included

1 mentions

Mildly negative

A commenter recommended pairing the mic with a separately purchased windscreen to get the best results, implying one isn't included with the microphone.

@TheOuthousePhilosopher

Great pickup. $20 is a steal. But their $7.99 windscreen and you’ve got a winner.

smart_display

March 16, 2021

Lewitt MTP 340chat_bubble_outlineFrom real comments

thumb_up_off_altBuy this if...

What users lovefavorite_border

thumb_down_off_altSkip this if...

What users complain aboutheart_broken

Compare in seconds

Who wins on what (similar price)

Versatile

Value for money

Vocal clarity

Low self noise

Feedback rejection

Durability

auto_awesomeOverall Impression

Lewitt MTP 340From real comments

Buy this if...

What users love

Skip this if...

What users complain about

Overall Impression