Friedman Amplification Friedman BE-100From real comments

Verdict distilled from 13 mentions across 7 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment50%
PROS 50%
CONS 50%

Rank based on 13 mentions across 7 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want a modded-Marshall style amp with a wide-ranging, growling gain character
  • You value reliability and low noise over vintage-amp quirks
  • You play classic rock to hard rock and can use a boost/distortion pedal for tighter high-gain tones

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need tight, focused high-gain metal tone straight into the amp without extra pedals
  • You're confused by or want to avoid tracking down which year/revision (2014 vs 2015 vs 2016) suits you
  • You're uncertain about the exact voicing/gain-structure switch differences and want a simpler control set

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Mid
Lightweight and gig-friendlyTube-like tone and feelExcellent clean channelExpensive, hard-to-find Tone CapsulesInconsistent or harsh crunch channelNo included footswitch
Lightweight and gig-friendly
Tube-like tone and feel
Excellent clean channel
Expensive, hard-to-find Tone Capsules
Inconsistent or harsh crunch channel
No included footswitch
2Premium
Exceptional tonal versatilityGreat cleanup via guitar volumeBig, huge-sounding tone for its size/wattageDark, bass-heavy voicing for somePrice relative to alternativesRequires volume-knob technique, not true multi-channel
Exceptional tonal versatility
Great cleanup via guitar volume
Big, huge-sounding tone for its size/wattage
Dark, bass-heavy voicing for some
Price relative to alternatives
Requires volume-knob technique, not true multi-channel
Best value
3Mid
Exceptional versatilityGreat with pedals / clean platformLong-term keeper ampCleans not its strongest suitFizzy or excessive gain out of the boxStock preamp tubes considered weak
Exceptional versatility
Great with pedals / clean platform
Long-term keeper amp
Cleans not its strongest suit
Fizzy or excessive gain out of the box
Stock preamp tubes considered weak
4Mid
Detailed, warm sound qualityGood speaker pairing versatilityHEOS streaming and internet radio convenienceAirPlay over Ethernet reliability issueDAC only active via optical/coaxial inputsLacks classic gold Marantz aesthetic
Detailed, warm sound quality
Good speaker pairing versatility
HEOS streaming and internet radio convenience
AirPlay over Ethernet reliability issue
DAC only active via optical/coaxial inputs
Lacks classic gold Marantz aesthetic
5Budget
Powerful for its sizeTonePrint effects built inClean, full, realistic toneAlways-lit tuner displayInsufficient power for loud full bandsSingle effect slot limitation
Powerful for its size
TonePrint effects built in
Clean, full, realistic tone
Always-lit tuner display
Insufficient power for loud full bands
Single effect slot limitation
6Premium
Tight, modern high-gain toneBuilt-in CabClone IR / direct outBuild quality and versatility praised by ownersHigh priceMissing third channel and solo boostNo EL34 as originally expected / power tube gripes
Tight, modern high-gain tone
Built-in CabClone IR / direct out
Build quality and versatility praised by owners
High price
Missing third channel and solo boost
No EL34 as originally expected / power tube gripes
7Mid
Strong power for demanding headphonesCompact, high-quality buildEnjoyable Bluetooth sound qualityEarly sound-mode switching bugLimited single-ended power for some planarsNot fully wireless
Strong power for demanding headphones
Compact, high-quality build
Enjoyable Bluetooth sound quality
Early sound-mode switching bug
Limited single-ended power for some planars
Not fully wireless
8Premium
Exceptional tonal versatilityOwner satisfaction and 'best amp ever' sentimentSmooth, musical high-gain distortionHigh priceOverwhelming number of optionsSome find it too polished or lacking rawness
Exceptional tonal versatility
Owner satisfaction and 'best amp ever' sentiment
Smooth, musical high-gain distortion
High price
Overwhelming number of options
Some find it too polished or lacking rawness
9Mid
Built-in reactive attenuator
Built-in reactive attenuator
10Mid
Great pedal platformLush onboard chorusExceptional clean toneBackground hiss/humWeak onboard distortionSome pedals don't pair well
Great pedal platform
Lush onboard chorus
Exceptional clean tone
Background hiss/hum
Weak onboard distortion
Some pedals don't pair well
You are here
31Premium
Friedman Amplification Friedman BE-100
Growling high-gain characterExcellent modded-Marshall toneReliability and low noiseUnclear circuit and mode detailsConfusing version differencesFizzy, loose gain for metal
Friedman Amplification Friedman BE-100
Growling high-gain character
Excellent modded-Marshall tone
Reliability and low noise
Unclear circuit and mode details
Confusing version differences
Fizzy, loose gain for metal

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

The BE-100 delivers a growling, modded-Marshall tone that wins over longtime vintage amp owners. One user who owned eight vintage Marshalls says the BE-100 finally combines fantastic tones, almost no noise, and reliability that their old amps lacked. Another calls it possibly the best modded Marshall tone ever, impressed enough after hearing a demo to buy a BE-100 profile pack for their Kemper. Fans defending the amp's gain level point to the preamp knob as the solution for those calling it too hot.

Not everyone finds the gain tight enough for serious metal out of the box. A 2016 model owner describes the tone as a bit fizzy and not tight enough for serious metal, suggesting it suits hard rock or classic rock better unless paired with a distortion pedal in front, similar to how plexi-style amps are typically used given their headroom. This creates some tension with other users who praise its high-gain growl and roar as a core strength of the amp.

Version differences across 2014-2016 models spark ongoing debate among owners. A 2014 BE-100 owner asks whether the 2016 update is a big enough difference to justify upgrading, wanting more open and raw sound. Another compares their 2015 unit's tone as quite different from a demoed version, while others ask about a new voicing switch for lower gain and a 4th toggle representing a new gain structure switch, indicating meaningful circuit revisions over the years.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?