Fitbit SurgeFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 43 mentions across 13 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment32%
PROS 32%
CONS 68%

Rank based on 43 mentions across 13 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want GPS tracking for running without carrying your phone
  • You want all-day heart rate monitoring without a chest strap
  • You value long battery life over color touchscreen features

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need reliable heart rate accuracy during weight training or HIIT
  • You plan to swim or shower regularly while wearing it
  • You want a durable band and long-term reliability

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choiceBest value
1Budget
Great value for priceExcellent battery lifeSolid fitness and sleep tracking for casual usePersistent syncing issuesInconsistent sensor accuracyBattery drain complaints early on
Great value for price
Excellent battery life
Solid fitness and sleep tracking for casual use
Persistent syncing issues
Inconsistent sensor accuracy
Battery drain complaints early on
2Mid
Stylish, appealing designStrong value for moneyLong-term durabilityBattery and charging failuresDisappointing screen qualityPoor customer service experience
Stylish, appealing design
Strong value for money
Long-term durability
Battery and charging failures
Disappointing screen quality
Poor customer service experience
3Mid
Easy hidden charging portAccurate HRM for weight trainingPositive overall satisfaction and upgrade experienceBluetooth pairing problemsNo GPS for distance/paceSync/charging assembly confusion
Easy hidden charging port
Accurate HRM for weight training
Positive overall satisfaction and upgrade experience
Bluetooth pairing problems
No GPS for distance/pace
Sync/charging assembly confusion
4Premium
Bright AMOLED displaySlim, lightweight designStrong battery lifeAMOLED sunlight and battery tradeoffs disliked by someUnreliable sleep trackingScreen scratch susceptibility and build concerns
Bright AMOLED display
Slim, lightweight design
Strong battery life
AMOLED sunlight and battery tradeoffs disliked by some
Unreliable sleep tracking
Screen scratch susceptibility and build concerns
5Mid
Built-in GPSLong battery lifeGood value for moneyMissing basic appsInaccurate sleep trackingMissing imperial units
Built-in GPS
Long battery life
Good value for money
Missing basic apps
Inaccurate sleep tracking
Missing imperial units
6Mid
Accurate trackingWorks well for arm-restricted activitiesEasy food logging and appWristband confusion causes inaccurate readingsEasy to loseDiscontinued product
Accurate tracking
Works well for arm-restricted activities
Easy food logging and app
Wristband confusion causes inaccurate readings
Easy to lose
Discontinued product
7Budget
No subscription requiredFrees the wrist for traditional watchesStrong heart rate accuracyInaccurate step and distance tracking on bicepInconsistent sleep tracking accuracyUnreliable scoring metrics
No subscription required
Frees the wrist for traditional watches
Strong heart rate accuracy
Inaccurate step and distance tracking on bicep
Inconsistent sleep tracking accuracy
Unreliable scoring metrics
8Mid
External HR Strap Pairing24/7 Heart Rate TrackingEasy USB ChargingBattery Life ConcernsHR Sensor Lag During WorkoutsInconsistent 24/7 HR Sampling
External HR Strap Pairing
24/7 Heart Rate Tracking
Easy USB Charging
Battery Life Concerns
HR Sensor Lag During Workouts
Inconsistent 24/7 HR Sampling
9Mid
Bright, high-quality AMOLED screenLight, comfortable, slim designPolar Flow app and no-subscription ecosystemDivisive strap designUI lag (pre-update)High price relative to features
Bright, high-quality AMOLED screen
Light, comfortable, slim design
Polar Flow app and no-subscription ecosystem
Divisive strap design
UI lag (pre-update)
High price relative to features
10Budget
Durable against water and washingEasy syncingMotivates activityStep counter fails to resetConfusing waterproof/swim claimsDifficult battery compartment
Durable against water and washing
Easy syncing
Motivates activity
Step counter fails to reset
Confusing waterproof/swim claims
Difficult battery compartment
You are here
31Premium
Fitbit Surge
Heart rate monitoring without chest strapGPS tracking for runningGood battery life relative to competitorsWater resistance failuresCycling and swimming not properly trackedInaccurate step and movement tracking
Fitbit Surge
Heart rate monitoring without chest strap
GPS tracking for running
Good battery life relative to competitors
Water resistance failures
Cycling and swimming not properly tracked
Inaccurate step and movement tracking

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

GPS and heart rate tracking are the Surge's biggest draws for runners. Multiple users highlight the GPS as the main reason they chose the Surge, letting them leave their phone at home instead of wearing an armband. The built-in heart rate monitor is also valued for eliminating the need for a chest strap. However, some note the HR sensor lags or misreads during intermittent bursts like HIIT or weightlifting, and accuracy improves when worn tighter or with the face on the underside of the wrist.

Step counting and activity tracking suffer from false readings. Several commenters report the device registering steps from driving, hand shaking, or even sleeping, since it tracks arm movement rather than true steps. Floors climbed are sometimes overestimated. Cycling and swimming are not properly supported as trackable activity types, frustrating users who want accurate stats for those workouts, despite Fitbit marketing showing cycling use.

Water resistance and band durability are recurring failure points. Multiple users report water intrusion behind the screen after swimming or even just washing a car, despite the device being marketed as sweat and splash resistant. Some got free replacements from Fitbit, others were denied coverage. Separately, several long-term owners describe the wristband cracking near the screws or becoming loose, sometimes requiring multiple replacements within under a year.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?