Apple iPhone 14 Pro MaxFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 29 mentions across 13 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment69%
PROS 69%
CONS 31%

Rank based on 29 mentions across 13 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want standout multi-day battery life with normal to heavy use
  • You value the Dynamic Island for calls and notifications
  • You want a premium, well-built phone with a great screen

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You're not willing to pay a high price and buy a charger separately
  • You're satisfied with your current iPhone (12/13 Pro Max) and see little upgrade incentive
  • You're bothered by oversharpened photos or occasional software slowdowns

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choiceBest value
1Mid
Massive 7000mAh battery50MP cameras with AI featuresWater and dust resistance (IP66/68/69)Not ideal for hardcore gamingPrice feels a bit high to some
Massive 7000mAh battery
50MP cameras with AI features
Water and dust resistance (IP66/68/69)
Not ideal for hardcore gaming
Price feels a bit high to some
2Mid
Large battery lifeStrong camera systemPremium, durable designPerceived high priceGaming frame dropsTouch responsiveness and software glitches
Large battery life
Strong camera system
Premium, durable design
Perceived high price
Gaming frame drops
Touch responsiveness and software glitches
3Premium
Headphone Jack RetainedGenerous Specs (RAM/Storage)No-Notch Hole-Punch DisplayHigh PriceUnnecessary Bixby ButtonConfusing Plus Model Differentiation
Headphone Jack Retained
Generous Specs (RAM/Storage)
No-Notch Hole-Punch Display
High Price
Unnecessary Bixby Button
Confusing Plus Model Differentiation
4Mid
Symmetrical bezel designCompact, one-handed sizeClean stock Android and updatesHigh price for midrange specsNo 120Hz displayNo dedicated image processing chip
Symmetrical bezel design
Compact, one-handed size
Clean stock Android and updates
High price for midrange specs
No 120Hz display
No dedicated image processing chip
5Mid
Massive 7000mAh BatteryIP66/68/69 Water & Dust Resistance50MP Front & Rear CamerasNot Ideal for Hardcore GamingPrice Slightly High for SomeCharging Voltage Error
Massive 7000mAh Battery
IP66/68/69 Water & Dust Resistance
50MP Front & Rear Cameras
Not Ideal for Hardcore Gaming
Price Slightly High for Some
Charging Voltage Error
6Premium
Iconic timeless designDeep nostalgic and sentimental attachmentRevolutionary industry influenceiOS 7 update caused severe lagHardware degrades with ageLow camera resolution by today's standards
Iconic timeless design
Deep nostalgic and sentimental attachment
Revolutionary industry influence
iOS 7 update caused severe lag
Hardware degrades with age
Low camera resolution by today's standards
7Premium
Versatile rear displayLong-term reliability from loyal usersGenuine innovation despite Apple comparisonsDesign closely mirrors AppleSome rear-screen features are region-limitedAluminum frame scratches easily
Versatile rear display
Long-term reliability from loyal users
Genuine innovation despite Apple comparisons
Design closely mirrors Apple
Some rear-screen features are region-limited
Aluminum frame scratches easily
8Premium
Useful Galaxy AI featuresFlat anti-reflective displayLong software support (7 years)Incremental upgrade for recent Ultra ownersLost legacy hardware featuresRegional chipset differences
Useful Galaxy AI features
Flat anti-reflective display
Long software support (7 years)
Incremental upgrade for recent Ultra owners
Lost legacy hardware features
Regional chipset differences
9Premium
Great value for moneyUltra-fast chargingBright, smooth display with high PWM frequencyUnderwhelming camera per some reviewersSlippery glass backCurved screen dealbreaker for some
Great value for money
Ultra-fast charging
Bright, smooth display with high PWM frequency
Underwhelming camera per some reviewers
Slippery glass back
Curved screen dealbreaker for some
10Premium
Overall satisfaction / best phone ownedS Pen functionalityValue deals and discountsInconsistent battery lifeHigh original priceCould use more RAM
Overall satisfaction / best phone owned
S Pen functionality
Value deals and discounts
Inconsistent battery life
High original price
Could use more RAM
You are here
31Premium
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Excellent Battery LifeDynamic IslandSatisfying Upgrade ExperienceLimited Upgrade Incentive for Recent ModelsNo Charger IncludedAlways-On Display Limitations
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
Excellent Battery Life
Dynamic Island
Satisfying Upgrade Experience
Limited Upgrade Incentive for Recent Models
No Charger Included
Always-On Display Limitations

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Battery life is the most praised feature, often lasting well beyond a single day. Multiple users describe getting through a full day of heavy use with battery to spare, and some report the phone lasting two days with average use, especially when dark mode is enabled on the OLED screen. Commenters upgrading from older iPhones and even a Pixel 7 Pro cite battery as a major selling point, though a couple mention battery issues on their current phone prompting an upgrade to this model.

The Dynamic Island is frequently cited as a game-changing, purchase-deciding feature. Several commenters say the Dynamic Island directly convinced them to buy or upgrade, particularly for easing switching during calls and general notification handling. It's credited with pulling people away from the iPhone 13 and even competing Android flagships. Not everyone loves it, though, as at least one commenter says they miss the plain notch and are holding onto an older model instead.

Solid build quality and camera are praised, but some software and pricing gripes persist. Users compliment the stainless steel build, screen quality, and speakers, along with satellite and crash detection features. However, complaints include no included charger, oversharpened photos compared to the 13 Pro, occasional slowdowns and app reloading after updates, weak automatic Wi-Fi switching, and the steep price tag drawing direct criticism from at least one buyer.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?