Xiaomi Redmi Smart Band 2From real comments

Verdict distilled from 11 mentions across 10 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment45%
PROS 45%
CONS 55%

Rank based on 11 mentions across 10 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want a simple, easy-to-use band without complicated setup
  • You are on a tight budget and just need basic tracking with SpO2
  • You do not need GPS-based distance tracking for sports

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need GPS for walking, cycling or running distance tracking
  • You need accurate heart rate and calorie readings
  • You want AMOLED screen, brightness sensor or continuous stress monitoring like the Pro model

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choiceBest value
1Budget
Great value for priceExcellent battery lifeSolid fitness and sleep tracking for casual usePersistent syncing issuesInconsistent sensor accuracyBattery drain complaints early on
Great value for price
Excellent battery life
Solid fitness and sleep tracking for casual use
Persistent syncing issues
Inconsistent sensor accuracy
Battery drain complaints early on
2Mid
Stylish, appealing designStrong value for moneyLong-term durabilityBattery and charging failuresDisappointing screen qualityPoor customer service experience
Stylish, appealing design
Strong value for money
Long-term durability
Battery and charging failures
Disappointing screen quality
Poor customer service experience
3Mid
Easy hidden charging portAccurate HRM for weight trainingPositive overall satisfaction and upgrade experienceBluetooth pairing problemsNo GPS for distance/paceSync/charging assembly confusion
Easy hidden charging port
Accurate HRM for weight training
Positive overall satisfaction and upgrade experience
Bluetooth pairing problems
No GPS for distance/pace
Sync/charging assembly confusion
4Premium
Bright AMOLED displaySlim, lightweight designStrong battery lifeAMOLED sunlight and battery tradeoffs disliked by someUnreliable sleep trackingScreen scratch susceptibility and build concerns
Bright AMOLED display
Slim, lightweight design
Strong battery life
AMOLED sunlight and battery tradeoffs disliked by some
Unreliable sleep tracking
Screen scratch susceptibility and build concerns
5Mid
Built-in GPSLong battery lifeGood value for moneyMissing basic appsInaccurate sleep trackingMissing imperial units
Built-in GPS
Long battery life
Good value for money
Missing basic apps
Inaccurate sleep tracking
Missing imperial units
6Mid
Accurate trackingWorks well for arm-restricted activitiesEasy food logging and appWristband confusion causes inaccurate readingsEasy to loseDiscontinued product
Accurate tracking
Works well for arm-restricted activities
Easy food logging and app
Wristband confusion causes inaccurate readings
Easy to lose
Discontinued product
7Budget
No subscription requiredFrees the wrist for traditional watchesStrong heart rate accuracyInaccurate step and distance tracking on bicepInconsistent sleep tracking accuracyUnreliable scoring metrics
No subscription required
Frees the wrist for traditional watches
Strong heart rate accuracy
Inaccurate step and distance tracking on bicep
Inconsistent sleep tracking accuracy
Unreliable scoring metrics
8Mid
External HR Strap Pairing24/7 Heart Rate TrackingEasy USB ChargingBattery Life ConcernsHR Sensor Lag During WorkoutsInconsistent 24/7 HR Sampling
External HR Strap Pairing
24/7 Heart Rate Tracking
Easy USB Charging
Battery Life Concerns
HR Sensor Lag During Workouts
Inconsistent 24/7 HR Sampling
9Mid
Bright, high-quality AMOLED screenLight, comfortable, slim designPolar Flow app and no-subscription ecosystemDivisive strap designUI lag (pre-update)High price relative to features
Bright, high-quality AMOLED screen
Light, comfortable, slim design
Polar Flow app and no-subscription ecosystem
Divisive strap design
UI lag (pre-update)
High price relative to features
10Budget
Durable against water and washingEasy syncingMotivates activityStep counter fails to resetConfusing waterproof/swim claimsDifficult battery compartment
Durable against water and washing
Easy syncing
Motivates activity
Step counter fails to reset
Confusing waterproof/swim claims
Difficult battery compartment
You are here
31Budget
Xiaomi Redmi Smart Band 2
Affordable PriceEasy To UseGood Value Versus Pro ModelBluetooth Connection DropsCannot Set Time ManuallyInaccurate Heart Rate And Calorie Tracking
Xiaomi Redmi Smart Band 2
Affordable Price
Easy To Use
Good Value Versus Pro Model
Bluetooth Connection Drops
Cannot Set Time Manually
Inaccurate Heart Rate And Calorie Tracking

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

It is an affordable, easy-to-use entry point into fitness bands. Commenters bought the Redmi Smart Band 2 for prices ranging from about €29 to €46.90 as a gift, and for that money they considered it worth it. One buyer specifically wanted a watch that was 'not too complicated' and found it smooth and easy to use across its options. Compared to the pricier Redmi Smart Band Pro, which adds AMOLED, a brightness sensor and continuous stress tracking, this base model still includes SpO2 monitoring, making it a reasonable value pick for casual users.

Sports and health tracking has real limitations. A notable gap is the absence of GPS, which one commenter said makes the band 'of no use' for those who walk, cycle or run and want route or distance tracking, even though they liked its look. Separately, another user reported that heart rate analysis and calorie tracking on their unit were 'far from accurate,' asking where the problem could come from, suggesting sensor accuracy is inconsistent for some owners.

Day-to-day use has a few rough edges. One user experienced the band dropping its Bluetooth connection to the phone and had to manually reconnect it, which they shared as a tip for others facing the same issue. Another complained that you cannot set the time manually and must go through the companion app instead. The manufacturer advertises about 6 days of battery life under intensive use, though one commenter flagged this claim with visible skepticism rather than confirming it themselves.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?