Withings Body CompFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 18 mentions across 11 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment35%
PROS 35%
CONS 65%

Rank based on 18 mentions across 11 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You're a longtime Withings user wanting expanded metrics like vascular age or PWV
  • You have a diabetic or cardiovascular monitoring need for neuropathy/PWV checks
  • You want basic weight tracking with optional advanced features

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You dislike subscription-gated data or fear losing free features later
  • You need highly accurate body fat, visceral mass, or vascular age readings
  • You're concerned about personal health data being shared or sold

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Premium
Innovative concept
Innovative concept
2Premium
Fast, hassle-free setupGreat for multi-bike or multi-rider householdsNatural road-like ride feelRequires a separate external power meterRear tire wearStress on front wheel and fork
Fast, hassle-free setup
Great for multi-bike or multi-rider households
Natural road-like ride feel
Requires a separate external power meter
Rear tire wear
Stress on front wheel and fork
3Premium
Responsive customer serviceRealistic, stable ride feelZero-faff convenienceUnit failures and reliability concernsCreaking and grinding noisesHigh price
Responsive customer service
Realistic, stable ride feel
Zero-faff convenience
Unit failures and reliability concerns
Creaking and grinding noises
High price
4Premium
Realistic muscle engagement on climbsAdds immersion and fun to indoor ridingImproved comfort on long ridesBelt failure and drop riskNoticeable lag between gradient change and movementHigh price relative to perceived necessity
Realistic muscle engagement on climbs
Adds immersion and fun to indoor riding
Improved comfort on long rides
Belt failure and drop risk
Noticeable lag between gradient change and movement
High price relative to perceived necessity
5Mid
Virtual shifting via Zwift Cog/ClickLong-term reliability for some ownersVery quiet operationPower accuracy discrepanciesRecurring ticking or ringing noiseWiFi/Bridge connectivity issues
Virtual shifting via Zwift Cog/Click
Long-term reliability for some owners
Very quiet operation
Power accuracy discrepancies
Recurring ticking or ringing noise
WiFi/Bridge connectivity issues
6Premium
Innovative conceptPotential for future improvementFits broader smart-home health trendHigh price for limited insightsDoubts about Withings' track recordCheaper alternatives exist
Innovative concept
Potential for future improvement
Fits broader smart-home health trend
High price for limited insights
Doubts about Withings' track record
Cheaper alternatives exist
7Budget
Good tone quality for beginnersAffordable price for beginnersBattery-powered portabilityUneven black/white key downweightCriticism of short/poor key actionFragile 1/8-inch output jack
Good tone quality for beginners
Affordable price for beginners
Battery-powered portability
Uneven black/white key downweight
Criticism of short/poor key action
Fragile 1/8-inch output jack
8Premium
Smooth, reliable long-term performanceWiFi bridge and firmware convenienceVirtual shifting via Zwift CogBearing and flywheel failures causing noisePower accuracy inconsistenciesVibration and stability problems on bikes
Smooth, reliable long-term performance
WiFi bridge and firmware convenience
Virtual shifting via Zwift Cog
Bearing and flywheel failures causing noise
Power accuracy inconsistencies
Vibration and stability problems on bikes
9Mid
Fast, seamless setup for someReliable for many long-term usersEcosystem integration with other Withings devicesFrequent setup and pairing failuresInaccurate or inconsistent body fat readingsLong-term connectivity breakdowns
Fast, seamless setup for some
Reliable for many long-term users
Ecosystem integration with other Withings devices
Frequent setup and pairing failures
Inaccurate or inconsistent body fat readings
Long-term connectivity breakdowns
10Premium
Quiet operationImproved ride feel over older trainersResponsive customer serviceCreaking, grinding and clanking noisesHigh price relative to valueUnnatural pedaling/resistance feel
Quiet operation
Improved ride feel over older trainers
Responsive customer service
Creaking, grinding and clanking noises
High price relative to value
Unnatural pedaling/resistance feel
You are here
12Mid
Withings Body Comp
Advanced cardiovascular metricsSimple, familiar ecosystemAutomatic baby modeSubscription requirement dislikedQuestionable body composition accuracyApp and data reliability problems
Withings Body Comp
Advanced cardiovascular metrics
Simple, familiar ecosystem
Automatic baby mode
Subscription requirement disliked
Questionable body composition accuracy
App and data reliability problems

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Metric accuracy is a major point of contention among users. Multiple commenters report inconsistent or outright wrong readings. One user created a fake younger profile and got a lower vascular age than expected, casting doubt on the whole metric. Others say visceral mass doesn't work, vascular age is intermittent, fat percentage is 'terribly wrong,' and there's no athlete mode, leading some to call the scale unreliable or even 'useless' compared to previous models.

The subscription model frustrates many longtime Withings customers. Several users express strong dislike for paying a subscription on top of an already-purchased scale, feeling they're just paying for numbers they should already own. Longtime WS-50 owners worry about losing functionality they've had for a decade, like standing heart rate, if they don't subscribe, and are unsure what data disappears once a subscription lapses, making some hesitant to upgrade.

Software and support issues undermine an otherwise appealing feature set. Some users report the updated Health Mate app causes connection problems and lost measurement data. One reviewer called the scale 'garbage' and described unhelpful, canned customer service responses when the visceral mass and vascular age features didn't work. Despite this, positive use cases exist, such as diabetic users valuing PWV and neuropathy tracking, and the automatic baby-weighing mode working well.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?