TCL QM9KFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 28 mentions across 13 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment39%
PROS 39%
CONS 61%

Rank based on 28 mentions across 13 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want near-OLED blacks with much higher HDR brightness in a large screen size
  • You can catch a discounted price close to or below the QM8K
  • You prioritize picture pop and immersion over perfect processing refinement

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You're sensitive to judder, motion blur, or soap-opera-effect artifacts
  • You're a dark-scene gamer who needs OLED-level clarity in shadows
  • You want to avoid any risk of PSU buzzing at high brightness, especially in 98-inch

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choiceBest value
1Budget
Exceptional value for priceNear-OLED picture qualityStrong gaming performanceLimited peak brightness in bright roomsBlooming around bright objectsInconsistent customer service
Exceptional value for price
Near-OLED picture quality
Strong gaming performance
Limited peak brightness in bright rooms
Blooming around bright objects
Inconsistent customer service
2Premium
Near-OLED black levelsExcellent color and picture processingHigh brightness for HDRGaming mode shortcomingsHigh priceWeaker performance in smaller screen sizes
Near-OLED black levels
Excellent color and picture processing
High brightness for HDR
Gaming mode shortcomings
High price
Weaker performance in smaller screen sizes
3Premium
No OLED burn-in riskExceptional brightness and HDR performanceExcels in bright, sunlit roomsBlooming and haloing artifactsBuild quality and software issuesOnly one HDMI 2.1 port
No OLED burn-in risk
Exceptional brightness and HDR performance
Excels in bright, sunlit rooms
Blooming and haloing artifacts
Build quality and software issues
Only one HDMI 2.1 port
4Mid
Excellent value for priceNear-OLED picture qualityBig-screen affordabilityLong-term reliability concernsInconsistent brightness/spec reportsStill not quite OLED for some
Excellent value for price
Near-OLED picture quality
Big-screen affordability
Long-term reliability concerns
Inconsistent brightness/spec reports
Still not quite OLED for some
5Mid
Near-OLED contrast and black levelsOutstanding value for priceSharp, vibrant overall picture qualityNarrow viewing anglesSoftware and HDMI reliability issuesBacklight bleed and blooming in dark scenes
Near-OLED contrast and black levels
Outstanding value for price
Sharp, vibrant overall picture quality
Narrow viewing angles
Software and HDMI reliability issues
Backlight bleed and blooming in dark scenes
6Mid
Great value for priceNear-OLED picture qualityGood built-in sound and remote designSoftware rough edgesSuboptimal upscalingDolby Vision and black crush complaints
Great value for price
Near-OLED picture quality
Good built-in sound and remote design
Software rough edges
Suboptimal upscaling
Dolby Vision and black crush complaints
7Budget
144Hz Refresh RateAffordable PricingCrisp Display QualityNOW TV App Streaming Limitations
144Hz Refresh Rate
Affordable Pricing
Crisp Display Quality
NOW TV App Streaming Limitations
8Mid
Strong Value for PricePicture Quality and Color AccuracyBuild Quality and Brand ReliabilityFire TV OS Is DivisiveNarrow Viewing AnglesNo Dedicated Input Button
Strong Value for Price
Picture Quality and Color Accuracy
Build Quality and Brand Reliability
Fire TV OS Is Divisive
Narrow Viewing Angles
No Dedicated Input Button
9Budget
Easy to calibrate for better pictureExcellent value for the priceImpressive mini-LED picture with deep blacksPanel inconsistency across sizesSoftware bugs and interface glitchesWeak built-in speakers
Easy to calibrate for better picture
Excellent value for the price
Impressive mini-LED picture with deep blacks
Panel inconsistency across sizes
Software bugs and interface glitches
Weak built-in speakers
10Premium
Excellent black levels and contrastHigh brightness and vivid picturePreferred over OLED for burn-in peace of mindWeak upscaling of lower-resolution contentNo Dolby Vision or DTS supportSoftware updates may degrade performance
Excellent black levels and contrast
High brightness and vivid picture
Preferred over OLED for burn-in peace of mind
Weak upscaling of lower-resolution content
No Dolby Vision or DTS support
Software updates may degrade performance
You are here
31Premium
TCL QM9K
Near-OLED contrast with much higher brightnessFirmware updates continue to improve the platformFrequent deep discounts improve the deal over timePower supply buzzing/coil whineColor accuracy/EOTF and gamma concernsLong-term reliability and build-quality doubts
TCL QM9K
Near-OLED contrast with much higher brightness
Firmware updates continue to improve the platform
Frequent deep discounts improve the deal over time
Power supply buzzing/coil whine
Color accuracy/EOTF and gamma concerns
Long-term reliability and build-quality doubts

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Out-of-box color and brightness impressed both salespeople and owners. Multiple in-store viewers and buyers described the QM9K as the most natural-looking TCL yet, less oversaturated than the QM6-8K, with HDR that made a Best Buy demo 'jaw drop' next to an LG G3. Owners called it stunning, with blacks resembling OLED but brightness far exceeding it, and several chose it over Sony Bravia 9 or Samsung OLED to save significant money while accepting a small processing gap.

A power-supply buzzing issue haunts some units, especially 98-inch models. Owners across QM8K and QM9K reported an audible buzz at high brightness traced to the PSU/coil whine, with one returning the TV twice for a Hisense instead. Others noted it's mostly a 98-inch problem tied to power draw, while some July/newer buyers reported no buzzing at all, suggesting TCL may have quietly addressed it in later production runs.

Processing, motion handling, and value-versus-QM8K remain sticking points. Commenters flagged an EOTF/gamma accuracy concern, judder in panning shots, dark-scene smearing on VA panels, and a sluggish, oddly-laid-out remote/UI shared across TCL's lineup. Many felt the QM9K's color-volume gains over the QM8K were marginal, arguing the QM7K or QM8K deliver comparable enjoyment for hundreds less, with firmware updates hoped to close the remaining gaps.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?