Tanchjim RitaFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 19 mentions across 11 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment62%
PROS 62%
CONS 38%

Rank based on 19 mentions across 11 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want LDAC/ANC wireless sound that rivals pricier headphones at a lower price
  • You're willing to use the Tanchjim app or forum EQ profiles to dial in the sound
  • You want a wired cable with a built-in mic included

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need fully replaceable, repair-friendly ear pads for long-term use
  • You prefer an over-ear fit with deep, large cups rather than on-ear feel
  • You expect great sound out of the box without needing EQ adjustments

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Premium
Apple AirPods Pro 2
Transparency ModeNoise CancellationSound QualityiOS/Apple Ecosystem Lock-inDurability/Crackling ConcernsHigh Price
Apple AirPods Pro 2
Transparency Mode
Noise Cancellation
Sound Quality
iOS/Apple Ecosystem Lock-in
Durability/Crackling Concerns
High Price
2Mid
Skullcandy Crusher
Signature haptic bass slider
Skullcandy Crusher
Signature haptic bass slider
3Premium
Sennheiser HD 490 Pro
Exceptional comfortStrong for gaming and imagingImprovement over HD 650/6XXIrritating L/R lettering inside padsBuild/pad quality issues reportedHigh price relative to alternatives
Sennheiser HD 490 Pro
Exceptional comfort
Strong for gaming and imaging
Improvement over HD 650/6XX
Irritating L/R lettering inside pads
Build/pad quality issues reported
High price relative to alternatives
4Mid
Sennheiser HD 25
Exceptional durabilityBalanced, quality soundFully repairable/modularCable-to-driver cutout issuesStrong clamping forceUnconventional cable entry side
Sennheiser HD 25
Exceptional durability
Balanced, quality sound
Fully repairable/modular
Cable-to-driver cutout issues
Strong clamping force
Unconventional cable entry side
5Mid
Philips SHP9500S
Exceptional comfort
Philips SHP9500S
Exceptional comfort
Best value
6Premium
Denon AH-D9200
Smooth, detailed treble and clarityStrong perceived value and end-game satisfactionTight, deep bassHigh price pointSibilant or fatiguing treble for sensitive earsTight fit for larger ears
Denon AH-D9200
Smooth, detailed treble and clarity
Strong perceived value and end-game satisfaction
Tight, deep bass
High price point
Sibilant or fatiguing treble for sensitive ears
Tight fit for larger ears
7Premium
Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones 700
Excellent Call and Mic QualityAll-Day ComfortIndustry-Leading Noise CancellationHigh Price PointInconsistent Call Clarity in Certain EnvironmentsBluetooth Pairing Problems
Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones 700
Excellent Call and Mic Quality
All-Day Comfort
Industry-Leading Noise Cancellation
High Price Point
Inconsistent Call Clarity in Certain Environments
Bluetooth Pairing Problems
8Premium
Shure SRH1540
Neutral, accurate soundExceptional comfortGreat detail and resolutionPerceived as 'boring' by some listenersElevated mid-bass/sub-bass not fully neutralSound highly dependent on seal and source
Shure SRH1540
Neutral, accurate sound
Exceptional comfort
Great detail and resolution
Perceived as 'boring' by some listeners
Elevated mid-bass/sub-bass not fully neutral
Sound highly dependent on seal and source
9Budget
Philips SHP9500
Exceptional value for moneyOutstanding comfortDetailed, neutral sound signatureLight or rolled-off bassCheap-feeling build qualityPerceived treble grain/sibilance
Philips SHP9500
Exceptional value for money
Outstanding comfort
Detailed, neutral sound signature
Light or rolled-off bass
Cheap-feeling build quality
Perceived treble grain/sibilance
10Budget
Apple EarPods
Excellent Sound Quality for PriceComfortable for Extended UseNo Charging RequiredLimited Noise IsolationBuild Quality ConcernsNot Secure for Active Use
Apple EarPods
Excellent Sound Quality for Price
Comfortable for Extended Use
No Charging Required
Limited Noise Isolation
Build Quality Concerns
Not Secure for Active Use
You are here
31Mid
Tanchjim Rita
Powerful app EQ and community tuningStrong sound-to-price valueGood looks for the priceFit leans on-ear rather than over-earNon-replaceable ear padsDark, bass-heavy stock tuning
Tanchjim Rita
Powerful app EQ and community tuning
Strong sound-to-price value
Good looks for the price
Fit leans on-ear rather than over-ear
Non-replaceable ear pads
Dark, bass-heavy stock tuning

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Stock sound needs EQ to shine. Multiple commenters describe the Rita's default tuning as dark, bass-heavy, and lacking treble air, which is surprising given Tanchjim's reputation for bright, treble-forward IEMs. However, users report that switching to the Balanced or Classical EQ presets in the app opens the sound up considerably. A dedicated forum community even shares custom 'Masterpiece' EQ profiles specifically to maximize the Rita's sound quality, suggesting the hardware has strong underlying potential once properly tuned.

Impressive value against pricier competitors. Several commenters compare the Rita favorably to established flagships, with one claiming it beats the Sony WH1000XM4 in sound characteristics, technical performance, and deep bass despite costing roughly a million Indonesian rupiah. Another notes the frequency graph resembles the Sony ULT Wear, calling that a positive at this price point. One user even considered replacing their aging WH1000XM4 with the Rita, reflecting confidence in its wireless sound quality relative to established competition.

Build and fit have some rough edges. A recurring concern is that the ear pads appear non-removable and non-replaceable, which worries users familiar with PU pad hydrolysis over time, since this could make the headphone effectively disposable once pads degrade. Fit is also described as leaning on-ear rather than true over-ear, with a request for deeper, bigger cups. Separately, one commenter found wired mode sounded notably worse than Bluetooth, suggesting the wireless chain is where the Rita performs best.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?