Sony ICD-SX712From real comments

Verdict distilled from 13 mentions across 9 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment33%
PROS 33%
CONS 67%

Rank based on 13 mentions across 9 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want a built-in limiter for more forgiving recording levels
  • You value directional stereo mics built into the unit
  • You want a recorder with easy computer file transfer

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need the highest possible bit depth and sampling rate
  • You do serious mastering or audio post-processing work
  • You want the most 'professional'-sounding built-in mic

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Premium
Studio-quality vocal soundMinimal monitor and drum bleedTrusted for regular gig useDistracting large logoHigh price tag
Studio-quality vocal sound
Minimal monitor and drum bleed
Trusted for regular gig use
Distracting large logo
High price tag
2Premium
High Owner SatisfactionExceptional Sound ClarityGreat for Field RecordingHigh PriceNot Omnidirectional / More MuffledUltrasonic Self-Noise & Wind Rumble
High Owner Satisfaction
Exceptional Sound Clarity
Great for Field Recording
High Price
Not Omnidirectional / More Muffled
Ultrasonic Self-Noise & Wind Rumble
3Premium
Reliable, plug-and-play operationClean, distortion-free audioSolid build quality
Reliable, plug-and-play operation
Clean, distortion-free audio
Solid build quality
4Premium
Post-recording pattern flexibilityVersatile across instrumentsStrong, non-boomy low endPrice barrier for some buyersUnclear M/S and connector design questionsLacking low-mid presence on some vocals
Post-recording pattern flexibility
Versatile across instruments
Strong, non-boomy low end
Price barrier for some buyers
Unclear M/S and connector design questions
Lacking low-mid presence on some vocals
5Mid
Strong overall sound qualityVersatile onboard EQ switchesBuilt-in gain boostHigh price for some buyersUncertain added value over existing setupFiddly dip switches
Strong overall sound quality
Versatile onboard EQ switches
Built-in gain boost
High price for some buyers
Uncertain added value over existing setup
Fiddly dip switches
6Mid
Smoother, clearer vocal sound than SM58/SM57Excellent on acoustic guitarDurable, long-lasting buildCan sound harsh in some applicationsAppearance not universally likedInconsistent noise rejection vs SM57
Smoother, clearer vocal sound than SM58/SM57
Excellent on acoustic guitar
Durable, long-lasting build
Can sound harsh in some applications
Appearance not universally liked
Inconsistent noise rejection vs SM57
7Mid
Excellent sound on drums and vocalsStriking, attractive designRecognizable, notable reputation
Excellent sound on drums and vocals
Striking, attractive design
Recognizable, notable reputation
8Premium
Smooth, warm characterCompetitive with top-tier micsFull-bodied, rich low endHard to distinguish from cheaper alternativesVery high pricePositioning-sensitive
Smooth, warm character
Competitive with top-tier mics
Full-bodied, rich low end
Hard to distinguish from cheaper alternatives
Very high price
Positioning-sensitive
9Premium
Rivals the Neumann U67Warm, creamy tube toneAttractive appearance
Rivals the Neumann U67
Warm, creamy tube tone
Attractive appearance
Best value
10Mid
Natural, unhyped tonePreferred over U87ai in blind testsLow sibilance / smooth highsAudible distortion noted at price pointCan sound muddy or bass-heavyCardioid-only, unlike multi-pattern siblings
Natural, unhyped tone
Preferred over U87ai in blind tests
Low sibilance / smooth highs
Audible distortion noted at price point
Can sound muddy or bass-heavy
Cardioid-only, unlike multi-pattern siblings
You are here
31Mid
Sony ICD-SX712
Built-in limiterConvenient file transferDirectional stereo micsInferior sound vs Zoom H1Lower bit depth and sampling rateUsers switched away from it
Sony ICD-SX712
Built-in limiter
Convenient file transfer
Directional stereo mics
Inferior sound vs Zoom H1
Lower bit depth and sampling rate
Users switched away from it

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Several users directly compared the Sony ICD-SX712 to the Zoom H1 and preferred the Zoom. Multiple commenters say they sold or stopped using the Sony ICD-SX712 in favor of the Zoom H1, citing better voice quality and a higher bit depth and sampling rate. One musically-trained listener described the Zoom as sounding 'professional' while the Sony sounded like a 'consumer product,' even when paired with the same external lapel microphone (Sennheiser ME2).

The Sony's built-in limiter is called out as a genuine practical advantage. Unlike the Zoom H1, which lacks a limiter and demands careful gain-level adjustment to avoid clipping, the Sony ICD-SX712 has a built-in limiter that gives users more leeway when setting recording levels. This convenience is mentioned as a specific reason the Sony can be easier to use in unpredictable recording situations, such as live events.

Built-in stereo mics and general usability got mixed but limited feedback. The onboard mics are directional rather than omnidirectional, creating a stereo image when angled outward, though one user notes the exact polar pattern isn't officially documented. Another buyer was surprised the unit had no printed manual, instead finding it stored digitally in the device's memory, a minor usability quirk.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?