Samsung Galaxy Note 20 UltraFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 11 mentions across 6 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment70%
PROS 70%
CONS 30%

Rank based on 11 mentions across 6 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want the full flagship Note feature set rather than the stripped-down base model
  • You value the Note lineage that loyal users say you'll never want to trade for an S series phone
  • You're fine paying more for what commenters see as clearly better value than the $999 base Note 20

What users love

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choiceBest value
1Mid
Massive 7000mAh battery50MP cameras with AI featuresWater and dust resistance (IP66/68/69)Not ideal for hardcore gamingPrice feels a bit high to some
Massive 7000mAh battery
50MP cameras with AI features
Water and dust resistance (IP66/68/69)
Not ideal for hardcore gaming
Price feels a bit high to some
2Mid
Large battery lifeStrong camera systemPremium, durable designPerceived high priceGaming frame dropsTouch responsiveness and software glitches
Large battery life
Strong camera system
Premium, durable design
Perceived high price
Gaming frame drops
Touch responsiveness and software glitches
3Premium
Headphone Jack RetainedGenerous Specs (RAM/Storage)No-Notch Hole-Punch DisplayHigh PriceUnnecessary Bixby ButtonConfusing Plus Model Differentiation
Headphone Jack Retained
Generous Specs (RAM/Storage)
No-Notch Hole-Punch Display
High Price
Unnecessary Bixby Button
Confusing Plus Model Differentiation
4Mid
Symmetrical bezel designCompact, one-handed sizeClean stock Android and updatesHigh price for midrange specsNo 120Hz displayNo dedicated image processing chip
Symmetrical bezel design
Compact, one-handed size
Clean stock Android and updates
High price for midrange specs
No 120Hz display
No dedicated image processing chip
5Mid
Massive 7000mAh BatteryIP66/68/69 Water & Dust Resistance50MP Front & Rear CamerasNot Ideal for Hardcore GamingPrice Slightly High for SomeCharging Voltage Error
Massive 7000mAh Battery
IP66/68/69 Water & Dust Resistance
50MP Front & Rear Cameras
Not Ideal for Hardcore Gaming
Price Slightly High for Some
Charging Voltage Error
6Premium
Iconic timeless designDeep nostalgic and sentimental attachmentRevolutionary industry influenceiOS 7 update caused severe lagHardware degrades with ageLow camera resolution by today's standards
Iconic timeless design
Deep nostalgic and sentimental attachment
Revolutionary industry influence
iOS 7 update caused severe lag
Hardware degrades with age
Low camera resolution by today's standards
7Premium
Versatile rear displayLong-term reliability from loyal usersGenuine innovation despite Apple comparisonsDesign closely mirrors AppleSome rear-screen features are region-limitedAluminum frame scratches easily
Versatile rear display
Long-term reliability from loyal users
Genuine innovation despite Apple comparisons
Design closely mirrors Apple
Some rear-screen features are region-limited
Aluminum frame scratches easily
8Premium
Useful Galaxy AI featuresFlat anti-reflective displayLong software support (7 years)Incremental upgrade for recent Ultra ownersLost legacy hardware featuresRegional chipset differences
Useful Galaxy AI features
Flat anti-reflective display
Long software support (7 years)
Incremental upgrade for recent Ultra owners
Lost legacy hardware features
Regional chipset differences
9Premium
Great value for moneyUltra-fast chargingBright, smooth display with high PWM frequencyUnderwhelming camera per some reviewersSlippery glass backCurved screen dealbreaker for some
Great value for money
Ultra-fast charging
Bright, smooth display with high PWM frequency
Underwhelming camera per some reviewers
Slippery glass back
Curved screen dealbreaker for some
10Premium
Overall satisfaction / best phone ownedS Pen functionalityValue deals and discountsInconsistent battery lifeHigh original priceCould use more RAM
Overall satisfaction / best phone owned
S Pen functionality
Value deals and discounts
Inconsistent battery life
High original price
Could use more RAM
You are here
31Premium
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
Strong owner satisfactionGenuine flagship Note experiencePreferred over the cheaper base modelHigh priceShort software support
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
Strong owner satisfaction
Genuine flagship Note experience
Preferred over the cheaper base model
High price
Short software support

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Owners genuinely love the Ultra's flagship experience. Multiple commenters who own the Note 20 Ultra express genuine satisfaction, with one saying they are simply 'loving' the phone and another describing excitement while unboxing it, joking about giving it a 'RAH' reaction. A third mentions their unit arrived earlier than expected and that they are enjoying it. One long-time Note user adds that once you've experienced a Note, going back to the S series never feels the same, suggesting the Ultra continues that loyalty-inspiring lineage of flagship devices that made the series popular among enthusiasts.

The Ultra is seen as the 'real' Note 20. Several commenters frame the Note 20 Ultra as the phone that should carry the 'standard Note 20' name, since it retains the premium features that were stripped from the cheaper model. One viewer explicitly says they would rather pay $1,299 for the Ultra than $999 for the base Note 20, implying the Ultra is worth the extra cost given how compromised the cheaper option feels by comparison, reinforcing that within the Note 20 lineup, the Ultra is viewed as the only version worth considering.

The premium price remains a major sticking point. Despite the praise, cost is repeatedly flagged as a problem. One commenter jokes about turning the Ultra into the 'Nope 20 Ultra' once they saw the $1,300 price tag, while another summarizes it bluntly as a device that is 'noice' but 'makes you broke.' A further comment claims the phone loses software support in under two years despite its high price, adding to concerns that the Ultra's cost isn't fully justified by its long-term value proposition.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?