Rode Broadcasterchat_bubble_outlineFrom real comments

Commenters repeatedly say the Broadcaster sounds more articulate and detailed than the SM7B, capturing vocal nuance rather than smoothing it away. Radio professionals praise it as a terrific voiceover and on-air mic.

@Valera32801

I've owned this microphone for 4 years now and it's really amazing and unique. It combines the quality of a condenser microphone and the functionality of a dynamic microphone, it does not catch much extraneous noise, and the price for this miracle really attracts against the background of all the advantages. It made it much easier for me to record without losing the sound. I have been choosing a microphone among many models for a long time and I chose it, I would like this diamond to remain unnoticed, but more and more bloggers notice it and give light to this cool device.launch

smart_display

April 15, 2026

@lucjanborkowski6328

In my opinion, this is the best microphone for voice broadcasting in this price range. Even the SM7B is a bit of a dull, flat sounding microphone. And the Rode Broadcaster sounds instantly ready, just as it should. And one more important thing: Rode still manufactures its microphones in-house, in Australia, not in China like Shure. I was writing this from a translator.launch

smart_display

December 30, 2025

@lucjanborkowski6328

I had the SM7B and now I have the Rode Broadcaster. Even though the price is similar, the Rode Broadcaster sounds significantly better than the SM7B. That's why I don't understand why people are so confused and keep choosing the SM7B. Especially since Shure now makes them in China, and rumors are circulating that their quality has significantly declined. Rode is so serious that they will never outsource production to just anyone; they continue to manufacture their products in Australia. I was writing from a translator.launch

smart_display

December 28, 2025

@lucjanborkowski6328

Hi. I've had the Rode Broadcaster for a few days now and I'm very happy with it. It sounds fantastic, much better than the SM7B. That's why I don't understand why people are so hung up on the SM7B. I think it's because Michael Jackson recorded with it, though not entirely because he recorded with the SM7. I used to have an SM7B and sold it after two months. I'll never understand why people are so excited about the SM7B. I have the Rode Broadcaster connected to a Lewitt Connect 2. It has a beautiful radio sound and a strong vocal depth. I was writing this using a translator.launch

smart_display

September 1, 2025

A large number of non-English-native commenters (via translator) consistently state the Broadcaster sounds significantly better and clearer than the SM7B, questioning its popularity gap.

@lucjanborkowski6328

The Rode Broadcaster is the best microphone for voice work. I've had the following microphones: MXL d.r.k., Shure SM58, Shure Beta 58, Rode NT1a, Rode NT1, Rode Procaster, MXL770, MXL440, Audio-Technica AT2035, Shure SM7B, Ckmova SXM-3, Lewitt Ray. And only in the end did the Rode Broadcaster prove to be the best microphone of all the ones I mentioned. And I got rid of all those. Only the best RODE BROADCASTER remains. I wrote this from a translator.launch

smart_display

March 22, 2026

@lucjanborkowski6328

In my opinion, this is the best microphone for voice broadcasting in this price range. Even the SM7B is a bit of a dull, flat sounding microphone. And the Rode Broadcaster sounds instantly ready, just as it should. And one more important thing: Rode still manufactures its microphones in-house, in Australia, not in China like Shure. I was writing this from a translator.launch

smart_display

December 30, 2025

@lucjanborkowski6328

I had the SM7B and now I have the Rode Broadcaster. Even though the price is similar, the Rode Broadcaster sounds significantly better than the SM7B. That's why I don't understand why people are so confused and keep choosing the SM7B. Especially since Shure now makes them in China, and rumors are circulating that their quality has significantly declined. Rode is so serious that they will never outsource production to just anyone; they continue to manufacture their products in Australia. I was writing from a translator.launch

smart_display

December 28, 2025

@lucjanborkowski6328

The Rode Broadcaster is the best microphone for voice processing; even the SM7B can't match it. If Michael Jackson had ever recorded with a Rode Broadcaster, people would probably have flocked to it just as they did to the SM7B. I was writing this using a translator.launch

smart_display

September 5, 2025

Multiple commenters call it underrated and underpriced for its quality, with one buying three used units for around $200 each versus SM7B pricing.

@Valera32801

I've owned this microphone for 4 years now and it's really amazing and unique. It combines the quality of a condenser microphone and the functionality of a dynamic microphone, it does not catch much extraneous noise, and the price for this miracle really attracts against the background of all the advantages. It made it much easier for me to record without losing the sound. I have been choosing a microphone among many models for a long time and I chose it, I would like this diamond to remain unnoticed, but more and more bloggers notice it and give light to this cool device.launch

smart_display

April 15, 2026

@Zagor-123

The broadcaster is extremely underrated and extremely low priced given it's quality.. I was hoping that we could keep it a secret. But since its out there now... 2:40 You talk a lot about the shock-mount attachment. And one of the features o this awesome mike is that it has an internal shock mount. The capsule is isolated from the rest of the body and won't transfer shock sounds to the capsule. This was specially designed for a broadcast environment in which convenient plugging in without a shock mount was important . You can use it almost as a it was a robust dynamic mike . Test the internal shock mount if you want, it works very good.launch

smart_display

August 6, 2025

@johnheiser2604

I bought mine last week on sale and was totally blown away. This mic is made specifically for the spoken word and that's it. And it does it exceptionally well.launch

smart_display

July 3, 2022

@Dyon

Here in the Netherlands EVERY radio station uses this mic, it's such an underrated microphone!launch

smart_display

May 7, 2021

Despite being a condenser, several users note it rejects background and extraneous noise unusually well, making it usable in less-than-ideal rooms. One user found it quieter than a Behringer or Shure in their setup.

@Valera32801

I've owned this microphone for 4 years now and it's really amazing and unique. It combines the quality of a condenser microphone and the functionality of a dynamic microphone, it does not catch much extraneous noise, and the price for this miracle really attracts against the background of all the advantages. It made it much easier for me to record without losing the sound. I have been choosing a microphone among many models for a long time and I chose it, I would like this diamond to remain unnoticed, but more and more bloggers notice it and give light to this cool device.launch

smart_display

April 15, 2026

@Valera32801

I have this microphone, and even on the most budget-friendly audio interface, it produced the clearest sound without any noise. Noise appears on its own when the gain level is really high, but as soon as I switched my Focusrite to RME, the noise disappeared, even though the microphone gain is provided by a DBX preamplifier. Otherwise, the microphone is super cool, it picks up little extraneous noise and has good sound quality, which cannot be said about Shure. Although I bought a Shure after my first Behringer B1 microphone, the sound quality became worse and it felt like a downgrade, so I returned the Shure and bought a Broadcaster, which satisfied my need for low sensitivity to extraneous noise and good sound quality.launch

smart_display

October 10, 2025

@redscott7179

I've been a fan of this mic a long time for podcasting & streaming, notes about some of the big downsides:\n1. Plosives: engaging the high pass filter helps a lot. The Rode WS2 gets rid of plosives entirely. If you don't like the foam look, the Roxdon HPF-1 pop filter works great and looks like it was made for the mic. I'd imagine the BSW RE27POP works as well.\n2. Cost. People overlook this mic because it's in the same price range as the SM7B. But if you're looking at the used market (in the U.S.), unlike the SM7B you can find the Broadcaster at huge discounts. I've slowly purchased 3 of them for slightly over $200/each on average\nThis mic's got great noise rejection, it doesn't need a ton of gain, for my voice I like the sound better than the SM7B or the RE20, and it looks great on camera! Really an overlooked mic imo.launch

smart_display

July 5, 2020

@GhostlyCop

Great review! I use this Mic daily and I have to agree with you on the Compression. I use the Rode WS2 Windscreen and it works perfectly. Having a nice quiet area is a must, being that it will pick up ambient noise, although not as bad as some other Condenser Microphones. I do use the proximity effect when I want to get close and personal. \nGreat honest review of the Broadcaster. Keep up the good work. 👽🎤launch

smart_display

August 28, 2018

Users highlight that Rode still manufactures in Australia unlike competitors, and that Rode honors warranty on Amazon-fulfilled purchases.

@lucjanborkowski6328

In my opinion, this is the best microphone for voice broadcasting in this price range. Even the SM7B is a bit of a dull, flat sounding microphone. And the Rode Broadcaster sounds instantly ready, just as it should. And one more important thing: Rode still manufactures its microphones in-house, in Australia, not in China like Shure. I was writing this from a translator.launch

smart_display

December 30, 2025

@lucjanborkowski6328

I had the SM7B and now I have the Rode Broadcaster. Even though the price is similar, the Rode Broadcaster sounds significantly better than the SM7B. That's why I don't understand why people are so confused and keep choosing the SM7B. Especially since Shure now makes them in China, and rumors are circulating that their quality has significantly declined. Rode is so serious that they will never outsource production to just anyone; they continue to manufacture their products in Australia. I was writing from a translator.launch

smart_display

December 28, 2025

@AudioHotline

One thing I want to clarify:\nRode DOES honor their warranty when you purchase on Amazon and it is “Fulfilled by Amazon”. Definitely be cautious and make sure that it is in fact fulfilled by Amazon!launch

smart_display

February 15, 2021

@WraithWTF

1:05 This is not correct. Rode will honor the warranty, provided you buy from Amazon.com ('shipped and sold by Amazon.com') and not from a third-party seller on Amazon.launch

smart_display

February 23, 2020

Commenters from radio stations in the Netherlands and elsewhere say every station uses this mic and that it performed excellently as a main voiceover mic for years.

@ShannonMoirAU

The best mic I’ve ever used. I upgraded a radio studio back in 2005 with them. Would love to upgrade my Procaster to a Broadcaster with my Rodecaster. The Procaster is great but the Broadcaster is next level.launch

smart_display

July 10, 2025

@jdbrownradio

At my first radio station, they had these in one of the three on-air studios, and one as our main voiceover mic in prod. They sounded terrific. Holds its own against the BCM-104 very well.launch

smart_display

April 17, 2022

@Dyon

Here in the Netherlands EVERY radio station uses this mic, it's such an underrated microphone!launch

smart_display

May 7, 2021

@velociraptor5962

Hey man, you should be talking straight it to this. Not speaking over the top of it. And yes, us in radio stations love it.launch

smart_display

January 11, 2016

The capsule has a built-in internal shock mount isolating it from handling noise, meaning an external shock mount often isn't necessary. Users confirm it works well when tested.

@lukeconroy9800

that mic is internally shock protected, the external one isn't needed. It's meant to be mounted from the back. I believe the light can also be used as a high pass indicator.launch

smart_display

June 12, 2026

@Zagor-123

The broadcaster is extremely underrated and extremely low priced given it's quality.. I was hoping that we could keep it a secret. But since its out there now... 2:40 You talk a lot about the shock-mount attachment. And one of the features o this awesome mike is that it has an internal shock mount. The capsule is isolated from the rest of the body and won't transfer shock sounds to the capsule. This was specially designed for a broadcast environment in which convenient plugging in without a shock mount was important . You can use it almost as a it was a robust dynamic mike . Test the internal shock mount if you want, it works very good.launch

smart_display

August 6, 2025

@clipeclipaway

IIRC the broadcaster works with the SM2 shockmount. Not the PSM1 which was designed just for the Procaster and its USB counterpart.\nWhile still not designed with the mic in mind, it does have clear room for the little LED bump or at least what I remembered from my local broadcast studio a decade ago.launch

smart_display

October 13, 2021