Ricoh GX100From real comments

Verdict distilled from 15 mentions across 8 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment71%
PROS 71%
CONS 29%

Rank based on 15 mentions across 8 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want GR Digital-like handling with added zoom reach
  • You value distinctive CCD black-and-white photo output
  • You're hunting for an affordable secondhand CCD compact

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You're bothered by audible zoom/lens mechanical noise
  • You need fast RAW file saving speeds
  • You want a totally silent shooting experience

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Mid
Excellent low-light image qualityLong-term durability and lasting usabilityRAW shooting and manual controlsNo optical zoom during video recordingHigh price for a compactFlash pop-up behavior confusion
Excellent low-light image quality
Long-term durability and lasting usability
RAW shooting and manual controls
No optical zoom during video recording
High price for a compact
Flash pop-up behavior confusion
Best value
2Budget
Compact, pocketable, GR-style handlingFilm-like CCD color and B&W renderingAffordable alternative to GR lineWeak high-ISO performanceLearning curve and required patienceAging hardware reliability issues
Compact, pocketable, GR-style handling
Film-like CCD color and B&W rendering
Affordable alternative to GR line
Weak high-ISO performance
Learning curve and required patience
Aging hardware reliability issues
3Mid
Great M-mount adaptabilityBeloved long-term favoriteExcellent 28mm/50mm A12 lens-modulesDiscontinued, limited upgrade pathSlow autofocusWeaker zoom/telephoto modules
Great M-mount adaptability
Beloved long-term favorite
Excellent 28mm/50mm A12 lens-modules
Discontinued, limited upgrade path
Slow autofocus
Weaker zoom/telephoto modules
4Premium
Excellent image quality for sizePocketable and discreetBright versatile lensHigh price for its ageAutofocus inconsistencyDust and mechanical wear
Excellent image quality for size
Pocketable and discreet
Bright versatile lens
High price for its age
Autofocus inconsistency
Dust and mechanical wear
5Premium
Versatile accessory ecosystemCinematic image qualityUltra-portable form factorDull colors and learning curveRising price over timeAutofocus and depth of field limitations
Versatile accessory ecosystem
Cinematic image quality
Ultra-portable form factor
Dull colors and learning curve
Rising price over time
Autofocus and depth of field limitations
6Mid
CCD sensor color qualityFlip-out LCD screenSharp, high-quality imagesLimited video recording capabilitiesPlastic body feels less premiumFeels outdated next to smartphones
CCD sensor color quality
Flip-out LCD screen
Sharp, high-quality images
Limited video recording capabilities
Plastic body feels less premium
Feels outdated next to smartphones
7Budget
Compact, pocketable designGreat value used/secondhandGood image quality for screen/social useBlown highlights and overexposureSmall sensor limits print qualityAuto lens cover scratching issues
Compact, pocketable design
Great value used/secondhand
Good image quality for screen/social use
Blown highlights and overexposure
Small sensor limits print quality
Auto lens cover scratching issues
8Premium
Excellent image quality and film simulationsCompact, pocketable design for street and travelHybrid optical/electronic viewfinderFixed lens limits flexibilityInconsistent autofocusNo in-body image stabilization
Excellent image quality and film simulations
Compact, pocketable design for street and travel
Hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder
Fixed lens limits flexibility
Inconsistent autofocus
No in-body image stabilization
9Premium
Highly pocketable and portableSharp, detailed image qualityGreat for travel and everyday carryCramped controls and small gripHigh and rising priceSmall viewfinder
Highly pocketable and portable
Sharp, detailed image quality
Great for travel and everyday carry
Cramped controls and small grip
High and rising price
Small viewfinder
10Mid
Compact, discreet everyday carryExcellent film simulations & JPEGsReignites creative passionRising used pricesSlower/dated autofocusSoft lens wide open / at edges
Compact, discreet everyday carry
Excellent film simulations & JPEGs
Reignites creative passion
Rising used prices
Slower/dated autofocus
Soft lens wide open / at edges
You are here
15Budget
Ricoh GX100
Outstanding black and white photosAffordable secondhand availabilityAttractive designMechanical zoom/lens noiseSlow RAW save timesSoft lens sharpness
Ricoh GX100
Outstanding black and white photos
Affordable secondhand availability
Attractive design
Mechanical zoom/lens noise
Slow RAW save times
Soft lens sharpness

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Handling and black-and-white photos are the GX100's strongest praise. Long-time Ricoh owners describe picking up the GX100 as like 'picking up an old friend,' citing wonderful handling that they feel all cameras should aspire to. Multiple commenters, including new buyers, praise the black-and-white image quality as outstanding or incredible, with the CCD sensor's rendering drawing repeated admiration even from people who haven't yet purchased the camera.

Mechanical noise and slow RAW handling are recurring quirks. Several commenters mention the electro-mechanical noise from the zoom and lens retracting, a trait also noted on older GR models, though one owner says people going about their business rarely notice it. A new owner specifically mentions super long RAW save times, and another jokes about softness suggesting the lens itself has quirks worth noting for buyers considering RAW workflows.

The GX100 draws comparisons across the Ricoh CCD lineup. Commenters frequently compare the GX100 to siblings like the GR Digital, GRD1, GR2, GXR, CX1, CX3, and GX200, treating it as part of a beloved CCD family with its own zoom-equipped niche. Some question whether the appealing rendering is truly CCD-specific or just Ricoh's general design approach, while others were persuaded to buy after watching comparison videos, sometimes finding units cheaply secondhand.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?