Polar M600From real comments

Verdict distilled from 31 mentions across 13 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment32%
PROS 32%
CONS 68%

Rank based on 31 mentions across 13 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want GPS tracking plus built-in music storage in one wrist device
  • You mainly care about workout tracking rather than daily smartwatch use
  • You're upgrading from an M400 and want Android Wear integration

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need multi-day battery life for continuous 24/7 or sleep tracking
  • You want a reliable optical heart rate reading during strength training or swimming
  • You dislike bulky watch designs or need dependable app/software stability

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Mid
Always-on displayMeaningful upgrade from older Apple WatchesSolid battery life for an always-on watchNot worth upgrading from Series 4Feels fragile without a caseNeeds nightly charging with always-on enabled
Always-on display
Meaningful upgrade from older Apple Watches
Solid battery life for an always-on watch
Not worth upgrading from Series 4
Feels fragile without a case
Needs nightly charging with always-on enabled
2Mid
Impressive Battery LifeVersatile Fitness Tracking FeaturesGorgeous AMOLED DisplayPrice ConcernsScreen Smudging and ScratchesIssues with Body Composition Measurement
Impressive Battery Life
Versatile Fitness Tracking Features
Gorgeous AMOLED Display
Price Concerns
Screen Smudging and Scratches
Issues with Body Composition Measurement
Best value
3Mid
Excellent Value for PriceGood Heart Rate TrackingLong Battery LifeInconsistent Heart Rate TrackingLimited Storage CapacitySoftware Bugs and Glitches
Excellent Value for Price
Good Heart Rate Tracking
Long Battery Life
Inconsistent Heart Rate Tracking
Limited Storage Capacity
Software Bugs and Glitches
4Budget
Impressive Battery LifeGreat Price-to-Quality RatioLightweight and Comfortable DesignLimited Storage CapacityInaccurate Sleep TrackingFragile Screen
Impressive Battery Life
Great Price-to-Quality Ratio
Lightweight and Comfortable Design
Limited Storage Capacity
Inaccurate Sleep Tracking
Fragile Screen
5Budget
Long Battery LifeAccurate Heart Rate MonitoringBuilt-in Alexa FunctionalityBattery Life DiscrepanciesInaccurate Tracking for Some ActivitiesStrap Durability Issues
Long Battery Life
Accurate Heart Rate Monitoring
Built-in Alexa Functionality
Battery Life Discrepancies
Inaccurate Tracking for Some Activities
Strap Durability Issues
6Mid
Long Battery LifeGood GPS AccuracyHigh-Quality Heart Rate MonitoringScreen Gets Dirty EasilyPrice ConsiderationsLimited Smart Features
Long Battery Life
Good GPS Accuracy
High-Quality Heart Rate Monitoring
Screen Gets Dirty Easily
Price Considerations
Limited Smart Features
7Mid
Larger, brighter displayDurability over timeFull-screen keyboardMinor/iterative upgrade for recent ownersLearning curve for first-time usersLimited neutral aluminum colors
Larger, brighter display
Durability over time
Full-screen keyboard
Minor/iterative upgrade for recent owners
Learning curve for first-time users
Limited neutral aluminum colors
8Budget
Great value for moneySkipping premium features isn't missedEasy to use, beginner friendlyBattery life disappoints some usersDurability and water resistance concernsMissing always-on display bothers some
Great value for money
Skipping premium features isn't missed
Easy to use, beginner friendly
Battery life disappoints some users
Durability and water resistance concerns
Missing always-on display bothers some
9Budget
Great value for priceNot missing high-end featuresStrong battery lifeNo always-on displayScreen fragility and crackingNo fast charging
Great value for price
Not missing high-end features
Strong battery life
No always-on display
Screen fragility and cracking
No fast charging
10Premium
Thinner, lighter designFast charging fits daily routinesMeaningful upgrade for long-term ownersBattery life limitationsIncremental yearly changesHeart rate accuracy issues during workouts
Thinner, lighter design
Fast charging fits daily routines
Meaningful upgrade for long-term owners
Battery life limitations
Incremental yearly changes
Heart rate accuracy issues during workouts
You are here
31Mid
Polar M600
Strong GPS performanceBuilt-in music storageFull fitness plus smartwatch functionalityBulky size and designSoftware crashes and bugsPoor battery life for 24/7 wear
Polar M600
Strong GPS performance
Built-in music storage
Full fitness plus smartwatch functionality
Bulky size and design
Software crashes and bugs
Poor battery life for 24/7 wear

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

GPS and core fitness tracking are the watch's strongest points. Multiple users say the GPS 'works really great' and is a major reason to choose the M600, including for golf, biking, and running. It also offers built-in music storage so users can leave their phone behind on runs, something one commenter said the review had completely missed. Owners moving from the Polar M400 or V800 generally found GPS performance solid, calling the watch a reliable training companion for structured workouts and route tracking.

Battery life and bulk make it a poor fit for 24/7 or sleep tracking. Several commenters note the watch needs nightly charging like a phone, which one called pointless for a fitness tracker meant to monitor sleep. Others complain about its large size, saying it's 'enormous' or too bulky for daily wear at work. Compared to Polar's own M400, which lasts weeks on a charge, reviewers feel the M600's short battery life and chunky design undercut its usefulness as an all-day wearable rather than just a gym tool.

Heart rate accuracy and software stability draw mixed, often frustrated feedback. One long-time Polar user called the wrist heart rate monitor 'spotty at best' and found sleep tracking 'next to worthless,' while others reported pairing failures with the H7 strap and heart rate not reflecting exertion. Software crashes like 'unfortunately Polar has stopped' appear across multiple comments when starting workouts. Combined with reports of slow official bug fixes and difficulty configuring the device, these issues make the ownership experience inconsistent even though the underlying hardware concept is well liked.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?