Motorola Razr 60 UltraFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 34 mentions across 12 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment50%
PROS 50%
CONS 50%

Rank based on 34 mentions across 12 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want a premium-feeling flip phone with a standout wooden or Alcantara back finish
  • You value a large, usable cover screen and don't mind paying a flagship price
  • You're upgrading from an older Razr and already trust the hinge/folding screen durability

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need guaranteed years of frequent security updates and software stability
  • You're price-sensitive, since many feel it's overpriced compared to alternatives
  • You rely heavily on camera video quality or accessory compatibility like cases and screen protectors

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Premium
Huawei Mate XT
Tri-fold design maximizes screen usabilityStrong brand track record and reliabilityImpressive engineering despite sanctionsHigh price puts it out of reachFragility concerns despite manufacturer claimsLimited availability and hard to obtain
Huawei Mate XT
Tri-fold design maximizes screen usability
Strong brand track record and reliability
Impressive engineering despite sanctions
High price puts it out of reach
Fragility concerns despite manufacturer claims
Limited availability and hard to obtain
2Premium
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Best-in-class cover screen
Xiaomi Mix Flip
Best-in-class cover screen
Best value
3Premium
OnePlus Open
Best-in-class multitasking (Open Canvas)Better value than competing foldsProductive large-screen use casesDead pixel reportsHigh priceDurability worries over time
OnePlus Open
Best-in-class multitasking (Open Canvas)
Better value than competing folds
Productive large-screen use cases
Dead pixel reports
High price
Durability worries over time
4Mid
Motorola Razr 50
Excellent cover screen
Motorola Razr 50
Excellent cover screen
5Premium
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Excellent camera systemPreferred over Samsung and Motorola rivalsCompact, functional cover screen aspect ratioUnderused cover displayCamera bump design criticizedReported display durability and repair issues
Oppo Find N3 Flip
Excellent camera system
Preferred over Samsung and Motorola rivals
Compact, functional cover screen aspect ratio
Underused cover display
Camera bump design criticized
Reported display durability and repair issues
6Premium
Huawei Mate X2
Overall hardware and engineering excellenceBest-in-class outer displayInnovative wedge hinge designNo Google Mobile ServicesVery high priceNo inner selfie camera
Huawei Mate X2
Overall hardware and engineering excellence
Best-in-class outer display
Innovative wedge hinge design
No Google Mobile Services
Very high price
No inner selfie camera
7Premium
Motorola Razr 2019
Nostalgic flip designInnovative foldable screen implementationCompact, pocketable sizeHigh price versus specsWeak battery lifeHinge and durability concerns
Motorola Razr 2019
Nostalgic flip design
Innovative foldable screen implementation
Compact, pocketable size
High price versus specs
Weak battery life
Hinge and durability concerns
8Premium
Oppo Find N2 Flip
Large, useful cover screenMinimal crease and flat foldPremium hinge and build qualityUnderdeveloped softwareCamera shortcomingsLimited cover screen app functionality
Oppo Find N2 Flip
Large, useful cover screen
Minimal crease and flat fold
Premium hinge and build quality
Underdeveloped software
Camera shortcomings
Limited cover screen app functionality
9Premium
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Tablet-Sized Unfolded DisplayIncluded Charger and Generous UnboxingThinness Comparable to Fold 6Very High PriceLacks S Pen SupportScreen Durability Concerns
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Tablet-Sized Unfolded Display
Included Charger and Generous Unboxing
Thinness Comparable to Fold 6
Very High Price
Lacks S Pen Support
Screen Durability Concerns
10Premium
Huawei Mate X5
Kirin 9000S chip performanceBrand loyalty and heritageSatellite callingLack of native Google servicesHigh price outside ChinaLimited global availability
Huawei Mate X5
Kirin 9000S chip performance
Brand loyalty and heritage
Satellite calling
Lack of native Google services
High price outside China
Limited global availability
You are here
31Premium
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Premium build and finishDurable folding screen for some long-term ownersClose-to-stock Android experienceHigh price relative to competitorsPoor update and security patch supportInconsistent software stability
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Premium build and finish
Durable folding screen for some long-term owners
Close-to-stock Android experience
High price relative to competitors
Poor update and security patch support
Inconsistent software stability

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Build quality and design stand out as the phone's strongest asset. Commenters repeatedly praise the wooden and Alcantara back finishes as stunning and elegant, alongside strong overall aesthetics for both screens. Long-term users of the 50 Ultra report the folding screen and hinge hold up well after a year of daily use, with no crease issues like they experienced on competing foldables, reinforcing confidence in the design's durability for many owners.

Software instability and Motorola's update policy are the most cited frustrations. Multiple users describe daily bugs requiring restarts, scrolling glitches, and 'garbage' software undermining otherwise excellent hardware. A recurring theme across several commenters is Motorola's poor track record on security updates, with some reporting zero patches for a full year on the 40 Ultra, driving frustration especially given the phone's premium price point above $1,000.

Screen durability and camera quality get mixed reviews depending on the user. While some long-term owners report their folding screen remains flawless after a year, others describe stripes, visible pixels, or screen protector peeling within months, alongside recurring screen 'issues' across three generations for one commenter. Camera opinions split similarly: some appreciate the 30x digital zoom, while others note blurry zoom results, focus hunting, and video quality that falls short of flagship expectations.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?