Lewitt DTP 640 REXFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 13 mentions across 9 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment75%
PROS 75%
CONS 25%

Rank based on 13 mentions across 9 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want a dual-element mic that blends dynamic punch with condenser detail
  • You record kick drums or other bass instruments like tuba or double bass and want a flat-response option
  • You're comparing it against the Beta 52A, D6, RE20, or Heil PR40 for kick duty

What users love

Skip this if...

  • The thread/XLR proximity issue on the related 340 REX model concerns you without a fix
  • You expect a completely original concept, since the AE2500 pioneered dual-element design earlier
  • You're on a strict budget, since it costs more than some single-element alternatives

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Premium
Lewitt MTP W950
Studio-quality vocal soundMinimal monitor and drum bleedTrusted for regular gig useDistracting large logoHigh price tag
Lewitt MTP W950
Studio-quality vocal sound
Minimal monitor and drum bleed
Trusted for regular gig use
Distracting large logo
High price tag
2Premium
Sennheiser MKH 8040
High Owner SatisfactionExceptional Sound ClarityGreat for Field RecordingHigh PriceNot Omnidirectional / More MuffledUltrasonic Self-Noise & Wind Rumble
Sennheiser MKH 8040
High Owner Satisfaction
Exceptional Sound Clarity
Great for Field Recording
High Price
Not Omnidirectional / More Muffled
Ultrasonic Self-Noise & Wind Rumble
3Premium
Sennheiser AVX
Reliable, plug-and-play operationClean, distortion-free audioSolid build quality
Sennheiser AVX
Reliable, plug-and-play operation
Clean, distortion-free audio
Solid build quality
4Premium
Lewitt LCT 640
Post-recording pattern flexibilityVersatile across instrumentsStrong, non-boomy low endPrice barrier for some buyersUnclear M/S and connector design questionsLacking low-mid presence on some vocals
Lewitt LCT 640
Post-recording pattern flexibility
Versatile across instruments
Strong, non-boomy low end
Price barrier for some buyers
Unclear M/S and connector design questions
Lacking low-mid presence on some vocals
5Mid
sE Electronics DynaCaster
Strong overall sound qualityVersatile onboard EQ switchesBuilt-in gain boostHigh price for some buyersUncertain added value over existing setupFiddly dip switches
sE Electronics DynaCaster
Strong overall sound quality
Versatile onboard EQ switches
Built-in gain boost
High price for some buyers
Uncertain added value over existing setup
Fiddly dip switches
6Mid
Shure Beta 57A
Smoother, clearer vocal sound than SM58/SM57Excellent on acoustic guitarDurable, long-lasting buildCan sound harsh in some applicationsAppearance not universally likedInconsistent noise rejection vs SM57
Shure Beta 57A
Smoother, clearer vocal sound than SM58/SM57
Excellent on acoustic guitar
Durable, long-lasting build
Can sound harsh in some applications
Appearance not universally liked
Inconsistent noise rejection vs SM57
7Mid
Sennheiser MD 441
Excellent sound on drums and vocalsStriking, attractive designRecognizable, notable reputation
Sennheiser MD 441
Excellent sound on drums and vocals
Striking, attractive design
Recognizable, notable reputation
8Premium
Telefunken ELA M 251
Smooth, warm characterCompetitive with top-tier micsFull-bodied, rich low endHard to distinguish from cheaper alternativesVery high pricePositioning-sensitive
Telefunken ELA M 251
Smooth, warm character
Competitive with top-tier mics
Full-bodied, rich low end
Hard to distinguish from cheaper alternatives
Very high price
Positioning-sensitive
9Premium
MXL V69M
Rivals the Neumann U67Warm, creamy tube toneAttractive appearance
MXL V69M
Rivals the Neumann U67
Warm, creamy tube tone
Attractive appearance
Best value
10Mid
Neumann TLM 193
Natural, unhyped tonePreferred over U87ai in blind testsLow sibilance / smooth highsAudible distortion noted at price pointCan sound muddy or bass-heavyCardioid-only, unlike multi-pattern siblings
Neumann TLM 193
Natural, unhyped tone
Preferred over U87ai in blind tests
Low sibilance / smooth highs
Audible distortion noted at price point
Can sound muddy or bass-heavy
Cardioid-only, unlike multi-pattern siblings
You are here
30Mid
Lewitt DTP 640 REX
Distinctive clicky, metallic toneGenerates strong purchase intentHolds up against classic kick micsConfusing switch controls without documentationNot an original conceptThread and XLR placement issue
Lewitt DTP 640 REX
Distinctive clicky, metallic tone
Generates strong purchase intent
Holds up against classic kick mics
Confusing switch controls without documentation
Not an original concept
Thread and XLR placement issue

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Owners of multiple kick mics rate the DTP 640 REX at the top of their collection. One commenter who owns the Beta 52A, RE20, Heil PR40, and DTP 640 REX says the Lewitt is their best overall kick mic despite liking different mics for different situations. Another prefers the Lewitt's blended tone over the Beta 52A in a side-by-side demo, admitting they initially saw it as an odd-ball mic at AES but have since come around to appreciating it.

The dual-element design delivers a distinctive clicky, metallic kick sound that users love. Multiple commenters describe the tone as immense, incredible, and crazy good specifically for kick drums, with one highlighting the clicky metal kick drum character as a standout trait. This blended dynamic-plus-condenser sound is frequently cited as the reason for enthusiasm, with one viewer saying they knew instantly they had to buy it after watching a demo, especially with everything boosted.

Surprising versatility extends beyond kick drums to bass instruments, though it's not first-to-market. One user with both the DTP 340 REX and 640 REX says the mic is actually very flat for a kick drum mic, making it excellent for bass instruments like double bass, tuba, bass saxophone, and even electric guitars. Another notes the Audio-Technica AE2500 pioneered the dual-element concept back in 2002, but points out the Lewitt is a few hundred dollars more affordable.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?