Korg ARP 2600From real comments

Verdict distilled from 38 mentions across 11 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment56%
PROS 56%
CONS 44%

Rank based on 38 mentions across 11 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want an authentic, officially licensed ARP 2600 experience with premium Japanese build quality
  • You value deep, exploratory semi-modular patching (filter/VCA mixing, ring mod as VCA, preamp distortion)
  • You see it as a long-term investment that will likely hold or increase its resale value

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You're on a budget and want similar sound/features for a fraction of the price via the Behringer 2600
  • You need keyboard-based expressiveness like velocity, built-in LFO, vibrato or portamento out of the box
  • You require guaranteed availability, as many regions reported units selling out immediately

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Mid
Articulate soundGreat with extended-range guitarsStrong overall tone qualityPrice concerns
Articulate sound
Great with extended-range guitars
Strong overall tone quality
Price concerns
2Premium
Musical analog toneLong-term reliability and board loyaltySimple, intuitive controlsHigh price pointCheaper alternatives seen as comparableDistortion at high settings
Musical analog tone
Long-term reliability and board loyalty
Simple, intuitive controls
High price point
Cheaper alternatives seen as comparable
Distortion at high settings
3Premium
Touch-sensitive dynamicsLong-term favorite / durability of appealSweet, low-gain tone qualityHigh price versus clonesDeluxe loses some original characterLimited mid control
Touch-sensitive dynamics
Long-term favorite / durability of appeal
Sweet, low-gain tone quality
High price versus clones
Deluxe loses some original character
Limited mid control
Best value
4Mid
Exceptional versatilityNatural, amp-like tonePowerful 3-band EQDemo videos undersell the pedalNoticeable noise floorVolume drop when engaged
Exceptional versatility
Natural, amp-like tone
Powerful 3-band EQ
Demo videos undersell the pedal
Noticeable noise floor
Volume drop when engaged
5Premium
Exceptional reverb qualityHigh-quality warm pitch shiftingStrong aspirational appealHigh priceCheaper alternatives may sufficeEffect can feel like it plays for you
Exceptional reverb quality
High-quality warm pitch shifting
Strong aspirational appeal
High price
Cheaper alternatives may suffice
Effect can feel like it plays for you
6Premium
Authentic amp-like toneExcellent low-to-mid gain driveUnderrated favorite among ownersHigh price pointLimited gain-staging flexibilityNo built-in reverb
Authentic amp-like tone
Excellent low-to-mid gain drive
Underrated favorite among owners
High price point
Limited gain-staging flexibility
No built-in reverb
7Premium
Iconic, powerful kick drumWarmer, more alive analog characterCultural and historical influenceExtremely high collector priceAnalog noise and static requiring EQReliability concerns of aging hardware
Iconic, powerful kick drum
Warmer, more alive analog character
Cultural and historical influence
Extremely high collector price
Analog noise and static requiring EQ
Reliability concerns of aging hardware
8Premium
Inspiring and addictive to playWarm, fat analog toneStrong DAW/VST editor integrationHigh price for what it offersLimited versatility outside bass rangeNeeds effects/partner gear to shine
Inspiring and addictive to play
Warm, fat analog tone
Strong DAW/VST editor integration
High price for what it offers
Limited versatility outside bass range
Needs effects/partner gear to shine
9
Klon Centaur-style toneConvincing demo influenced purchaseExcellent clean boostNot suited for metal tones
Klon Centaur-style tone
Convincing demo influenced purchase
Excellent clean boost
Not suited for metal tones
10Mid
Transparent toneVersatile across genresWorks well across many guitar typesTwo-channel routing complexityDry signal bleed-throughInconsistent demo impressions
Transparent tone
Versatile across genres
Works well across many guitar types
Two-channel routing complexity
Dry signal bleed-through
Inconsistent demo impressions
You are here
31Premium
Korg ARP 2600
Authentic vintage ARP soundDeep, exploratory patchingPremium build and authenticityHigh priceBuild quality concerns and cheap-feeling accessoriesDoesn't fully match original character
Korg ARP 2600
Authentic vintage ARP sound
Deep, exploratory patching
Premium build and authenticity
High price
Build quality concerns and cheap-feeling accessories
Doesn't fully match original character

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Original ARP 2600 owners largely agree the Korg reissue nails the vintage sound. Multiple commenters who owned genuine 1970s units say this new version sounds almost exactly the same, calling it faithfully recreated with stable oscillators and a full-size feel, even from a smaller module. Others note subtle differences, like the originals sounding a bit dirtier or having more character in the envelope attack clicks, but overall reactions to the tone are very positive, including comparisons where it reportedly outperforms Behringer's version.

Deep patching possibilities keep experienced users discovering new sounds. Even synthesists with decades of experience report learning new tricks, such as using the ring modulator as a VCA or combining filter and VCA outputs for added complexity. Tutorial-style demos that explain full signal paths rather than just showcasing patches are especially praised. The built-in preamp with overdrive is called one of the best simple distortion tools available, adding to the instrument's exploratory appeal.

Price and missing keyboard features are the most common sticking points. Commenters repeatedly compare the cost unfavorably to the original 1971 price after inflation, to competitors like the Matriarch, and especially to the Behringer 2600 which is far cheaper. Several note Korg omitted keyboard-based LFO, vibrato, portamento and velocity sensing that Behringer's model includes standard, calling it a step backward in some respects despite acknowledging the authenticity premium buyers are paying for.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?