Kodak PIXPRO FZ43From real comments

Verdict distilled from 14 mentions across 10 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment43%
PROS 43%
CONS 57%

Rank based on 14 mentions across 10 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want a very cheap, easy-to-use point-and-shoot
  • You're fine using AA batteries and carrying spares
  • You just need casual photos, not sound-focused footage

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need reliable audio for talking or vehicle sounds
  • You want fast, simple photo/video transfer to a computer
  • You're comparing against GoPro or Canon for quality

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Mid
Excellent low-light image qualityLong-term durability and lasting usabilityRAW shooting and manual controlsNo optical zoom during video recordingHigh price for a compactFlash pop-up behavior confusion
Excellent low-light image quality
Long-term durability and lasting usability
RAW shooting and manual controls
No optical zoom during video recording
High price for a compact
Flash pop-up behavior confusion
Best value
2Budget
Compact, pocketable, GR-style handlingFilm-like CCD color and B&W renderingAffordable alternative to GR lineWeak high-ISO performanceLearning curve and required patienceAging hardware reliability issues
Compact, pocketable, GR-style handling
Film-like CCD color and B&W rendering
Affordable alternative to GR line
Weak high-ISO performance
Learning curve and required patience
Aging hardware reliability issues
3Mid
Great M-mount adaptabilityBeloved long-term favoriteExcellent 28mm/50mm A12 lens-modulesDiscontinued, limited upgrade pathSlow autofocusWeaker zoom/telephoto modules
Great M-mount adaptability
Beloved long-term favorite
Excellent 28mm/50mm A12 lens-modules
Discontinued, limited upgrade path
Slow autofocus
Weaker zoom/telephoto modules
4Premium
Excellent image quality for sizePocketable and discreetBright versatile lensHigh price for its ageAutofocus inconsistencyDust and mechanical wear
Excellent image quality for size
Pocketable and discreet
Bright versatile lens
High price for its age
Autofocus inconsistency
Dust and mechanical wear
5Premium
Versatile accessory ecosystemCinematic image qualityUltra-portable form factorDull colors and learning curveRising price over timeAutofocus and depth of field limitations
Versatile accessory ecosystem
Cinematic image quality
Ultra-portable form factor
Dull colors and learning curve
Rising price over time
Autofocus and depth of field limitations
6Mid
CCD sensor color qualityFlip-out LCD screenSharp, high-quality imagesLimited video recording capabilitiesPlastic body feels less premiumFeels outdated next to smartphones
CCD sensor color quality
Flip-out LCD screen
Sharp, high-quality images
Limited video recording capabilities
Plastic body feels less premium
Feels outdated next to smartphones
7Budget
Compact, pocketable designGreat value used/secondhandGood image quality for screen/social useBlown highlights and overexposureSmall sensor limits print qualityAuto lens cover scratching issues
Compact, pocketable design
Great value used/secondhand
Good image quality for screen/social use
Blown highlights and overexposure
Small sensor limits print quality
Auto lens cover scratching issues
8Premium
Excellent image quality and film simulationsCompact, pocketable design for street and travelHybrid optical/electronic viewfinderFixed lens limits flexibilityInconsistent autofocusNo in-body image stabilization
Excellent image quality and film simulations
Compact, pocketable design for street and travel
Hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder
Fixed lens limits flexibility
Inconsistent autofocus
No in-body image stabilization
9Premium
Highly pocketable and portableSharp, detailed image qualityGreat for travel and everyday carryCramped controls and small gripHigh and rising priceSmall viewfinder
Highly pocketable and portable
Sharp, detailed image quality
Great for travel and everyday carry
Cramped controls and small grip
High and rising price
Small viewfinder
10Mid
Compact, discreet everyday carryExcellent film simulations & JPEGsReignites creative passionRising used pricesSlower/dated autofocusSoft lens wide open / at edges
Compact, discreet everyday carry
Excellent film simulations & JPEGs
Reignites creative passion
Rising used prices
Slower/dated autofocus
Soft lens wide open / at edges
You are here
31Budget
Kodak PIXPRO FZ43
Budget-Friendly PriceClear Voice Audio (disputed)Easy to UseFast Battery DrainPoor Sound for Vehicle/Ambient RecordingWeak Image/Video Quality vs Competitors
Kodak PIXPRO FZ43
Budget-Friendly Price
Clear Voice Audio (disputed)
Easy to Use
Fast Battery Drain
Poor Sound for Vehicle/Ambient Recording
Weak Image/Video Quality vs Competitors

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Budget pricing draws buyers in, but experiences quickly diverge. Shoppers find the FZ43 in Walmart's budget camera bin, with one Canadian buyer calling $120 a bargain. A paranormal investigator praised it as easier to use and better than pricier cameras they'd owned. However, others directly compare it unfavorably to a GoPro, a Canon, and a cheaper Polaroid alternative, saying image, video, and sound quality fall short despite the low price.

Audio performance is a recurring point of confusion and complaint. One user was amazed by clear voice audio, but another owner disputes this, saying their unit doesn't sound the same and wants more proof. A car-channel reviewer found it poor at capturing engine and car sounds specifically, while another noted it instead picks up too much ambient noise in loud areas, questioning whether an external microphone is even supported.

Battery life and file transfer create real practical headaches. The camera itself is light at under five ounces, but requires four AA batteries that reportedly die very quickly, forcing users to carry spares or seek rechargeable alternatives. Getting content off the camera is another pain point: one user couldn't get photos to download or transfer at all, partly blaming non-English instructions, though another found success by removing the memory card and reading it on a desktop PC.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?