Intel Core i7-13700KFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 4 mentions across 1 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment100%
PROS 100%

Rank based on 4 mentions across 1 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want strong single-core plus multi-core performance for gaming and mixed workloads
  • You're upgrading from an older CPU like a 9700k, 10700k or 3950X and want a big FPS jump
  • You're willing to undervolt or set power limits to manage heat and power draw

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You're worried about the reported 13th/14th gen Raptor Lake instability issues
  • You want low stock power draw and temps without any manual tuning
  • You're on a tight electricity budget and don't want to manage power limits

What users complain about

No cons data available.

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choiceBest value
1Budget
Excellent price-to-performanceGreat upgrade from older CPUsStrong gaming performance with mid/high GPUs5600X price premium not justifiedUncertainty about upgrade value from similar-gen CPUs
Excellent price-to-performance
Great upgrade from older CPUs
Strong gaming performance with mid/high GPUs
5600X price premium not justified
Uncertainty about upgrade value from similar-gen CPUs
2Mid
Great Price-to-Performance ValueEasy Drop-in UpgradeAM4 Platform LongevityCooling Requirements Under LoadFuture-Proofing UncertaintyLimited Workstation/Video Editing Strength
Great Price-to-Performance Value
Easy Drop-in Upgrade
AM4 Platform Longevity
Cooling Requirements Under Load
Future-Proofing Uncertainty
Limited Workstation/Video Editing Strength
3Budget
Low power drawGreat drop-in upgrade for old AM4 boardsGreat value / price-to-performanceThermal comparison to 5800X not well documentedCan run hot under sustained load without good coolingLate arrival to market
Low power draw
Great drop-in upgrade for old AM4 boards
Great value / price-to-performance
Thermal comparison to 5800X not well documented
Can run hot under sustained load without good cooling
Late arrival to market
4Premium
Excellent multicore performance for content creationBeats Intel counterparts in benchmarksSmooth, high-fps gaming performanceSevere launch stock shortages and scalpingHigh price point for some buyersModest generational gains over 3000-series for the price increase
Excellent multicore performance for content creation
Beats Intel counterparts in benchmarks
Smooth, high-fps gaming performance
Severe launch stock shortages and scalping
High price point for some buyers
Modest generational gains over 3000-series for the price increase
5Mid
Excellent overclocking headroomLong-term longevityStrong gaming performanceEventually outclassed by newer chipsInconsistent benchmark resultsRequires new motherboard platform
Excellent overclocking headroom
Long-term longevity
Strong gaming performance
Eventually outclassed by newer chips
Inconsistent benchmark results
Requires new motherboard platform
6Budget
Power efficiencyGreat value / affordable pricingStrong gaming performance for the priceExpensive AM5 motherboardsCostly DDR5 RAMLimited budget board options at launch
Power efficiency
Great value / affordable pricing
Strong gaming performance for the price
Expensive AM5 motherboards
Costly DDR5 RAM
Limited budget board options at launch
7Mid
Extends AM4 platform lifeMajor gaming FPS upliftBuilds long-term brand goodwill for AMDLater pricing seen as excessiveCan bottleneck top-tier GPUs at high refreshStock availability issues
Extends AM4 platform life
Major gaming FPS uplift
Builds long-term brand goodwill for AMD
Later pricing seen as excessive
Can bottleneck top-tier GPUs at high refresh
Stock availability issues
8Premium
Clear generational and cross-brand upgradeBest-in-class 1% low frame ratesPower efficiencyQuestionable value vs cheaper alternativesModest generational FPS gainsHigh price for core count
Clear generational and cross-brand upgrade
Best-in-class 1% low frame rates
Power efficiency
Questionable value vs cheaper alternatives
Modest generational FPS gains
High price for core count
9Premium
Long-term platform stabilityStrong multi-threaded workstation performanceAmple PCIe lanes and memory bandwidthVery high launch priceWeak gaming performance relative to priceMediocre overclocking headroom
Long-term platform stability
Strong multi-threaded workstation performance
Ample PCIe lanes and memory bandwidth
Very high launch price
Weak gaming performance relative to price
Mediocre overclocking headroom
10Premium
Excellent for productivity workloadsIntegrated graphics as a safety netStrong generational performance gainsOverkill and poor value for pure gamingPricing awkwardly close to the 7950XOlder 5000-series chips offer better value
Excellent for productivity workloads
Integrated graphics as a safety net
Strong generational performance gains
Overkill and poor value for pure gaming
Pricing awkwardly close to the 7950X
Older 5000-series chips offer better value
You are here
16Mid
Intel Core i7-13700K
Strong gaming performance
Intel Core i7-13700K
Strong gaming performance

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Gaming and mixed-use performance impressed many upgraders. Users moving from CPUs like the 10700k, 9700k, 3950X and 6600 reported dramatic improvements, including doubled frame rates in titles like Doom Eternal and Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Others praised snappy Windows performance, fast app loading, and strong single-threaded output for simulation-type games. The 8 E-cores paired with strong single-core speed were called the best of both worlds, making the chip a reliable long-term choice similar to past i7 generations.

Stock temperatures and power draw are a common complaint. Multiple users reported hitting 90-100C and drawing 230-258W under Cinebench-style multicore loads at stock settings, even with capable coolers like 240-360mm AIOs. Some questioned whether manufacturers push chips to their limits just to look good on benchmarks. Concerns extended to rising electricity costs and whether cooling setups like air coolers or an AK620 would be sufficient for sustained loads.

Undervolting and power limiting turn the chip into a favorite. Many commenters described undervolting or setting power limits (e.g., to 115W or ~173W) as transforming the CPU's thermals and efficiency with little to no real-world performance loss, calling it a no brainer. Reported results included temps dropping from around 100C to 80-85C while retaining similar Cinebench scores. Several users shared specific voltage and frequency settings, and one highlighted daily desktop power draw as low as ~100W.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?