EVGA GeForce GTX 1650From real comments

Verdict distilled from 12 mentions across 5 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment20%
PROS 20%
CONS 80%

Rank based on 12 mentions across 5 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want a heavily built cooling solution even on a lower-end card
  • You have ample case slot space to spare (3+ slots)
  • You are already committed to EVGA's cooling design and don't mind the bulk

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You need a low-profile or single-slot card for a compact build
  • You expect strong price-to-performance versus alternatives like the RX570
  • You want a card without an extra 6-pin power connector requirement

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Mid
Cool, quiet cooling performanceSleek, understated build qualityLow power consumptionHigh prices during shortageCoil whine on some unitsFan durability concerns long-term
Cool, quiet cooling performance
Sleek, understated build quality
Low power consumption
High prices during shortage
Coil whine on some units
Fan durability concerns long-term
Best value
2Budget
Exceptional longevitySolid 1080p performanceGood upgrade path from old GPUsLimited to lower/medium settings for demanding gamesNot top-tier performanceFan/cooler reliability over time
Exceptional longevity
Solid 1080p performance
Good upgrade path from old GPUs
Limited to lower/medium settings for demanding games
Not top-tier performance
Fan/cooler reliability over time
3Premium
Exceptional longevityStrong 1440p gaming performanceGreat used market valueEventually needs replacement in demanding gamesLacks modern feature setThermal paste degradation over time
Exceptional longevity
Strong 1440p gaming performance
Great used market value
Eventually needs replacement in demanding games
Lacks modern feature set
Thermal paste degradation over time
4Mid
Strong 1080p gaming performanceExcellent value for moneyLong-term reliability and longevityBrand-specific fan noise concernsLimited VRAM versus competitorsOccasional driver/compatibility issues
Strong 1080p gaming performance
Excellent value for money
Long-term reliability and longevity
Brand-specific fan noise concerns
Limited VRAM versus competitors
Occasional driver/compatibility issues
5Mid
Strong 1080p/1440p performancePerformance comparable to GTX 1070/1070Ti at lower priceLong-term reliability and aging wellHigh price for a mid-range card12GB variant seen as poor value or confusingLimited 6GB VRAM
Strong 1080p/1440p performance
Performance comparable to GTX 1070/1070Ti at lower price
Long-term reliability and aging well
High price for a mid-range card
12GB variant seen as poor value or confusing
Limited 6GB VRAM
6Budget
No external power connector neededGreat for small form factor and HTPC buildsLater became a good value due to shortagesPoor value versus RX 570Overpriced at launchRegional price disparities make it worse value
No external power connector needed
Great for small form factor and HTPC builds
Later became a good value due to shortages
Poor value versus RX 570
Overpriced at launch
Regional price disparities make it worse value
7Mid
Near-MSRP pricing and dealsCool operating temperaturesQuiet operation for most unitsCoil whine / fan noise on some unitsConfusing naming schemeNew 12-pin power connector adoption concerns
Near-MSRP pricing and deals
Cool operating temperatures
Quiet operation for most units
Coil whine / fan noise on some units
Confusing naming scheme
New 12-pin power connector adoption concerns
8Mid
Frequently available at or near MSRPStrong performance upgrade from older GPUsRuns cool and quiet, undervolts wellCoil whine or fan noise on some units12GB VRAM may limit future-proofingVoltage locked, limiting overclocking on some units
Frequently available at or near MSRP
Strong performance upgrade from older GPUs
Runs cool and quiet, undervolts well
Coil whine or fan noise on some units
12GB VRAM may limit future-proofing
Voltage locked, limiting overclocking on some units
9Budget
Solid 1080p performanceExcellent budget valueExceptional longevityStruggles with demanding modern gamesCooling wear over yearsDriver instability
Solid 1080p performance
Excellent budget value
Exceptional longevity
Struggles with demanding modern games
Cooling wear over years
Driver instability
10Budget
Low power draw
Low power draw
You are here
31Budget
EVGA GeForce GTX 1650
Robust cooling buildOversized 2.75-3 slot designThermal pad and paste quality concernsNo low-profile or 6-pin-free variant
EVGA GeForce GTX 1650
Robust cooling build
Oversized 2.75-3 slot design
Thermal pad and paste quality concerns
No low-profile or 6-pin-free variant

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

The card's size draws the most consistent criticism from commenters. Multiple users express frustration that a card marketed toward e-sports or entry-level gaming ships as a 2.75 to 3 slot design, eating up case space some don't have to spare. Comparisons are drawn to EVGA's own high-end RTX 2070 XC Ultra, which has similar bulk despite being a far more powerful card, leading some to see the sizing as disproportionate for a 'lowish mid range' GPU like the 1650.

Some commenters feel the cooling is overkill for what the card delivers. One user notes the card has a 3-slot cooler with only one power connector, adding that they 'don't expect to be breaking records' with it, implying the thermal solution outpaces the actual performance need. Another separately praises EVGA's cooling engineering in general terms, suggesting the build quality itself isn't in question, just its necessity here.

Value versus competing cards is directly challenged by at least one commenter. A commenter states the 1650 is 'dead on arrival,' citing roughly 10 percent lower performance than the RX570 while also being more expensive, and advises against buying it at that price. This is paired with practical concerns from others about the internal build, including questions on thermal pad thickness and an observed oily residue around memory chips during a teardown.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?