Endgame Gear XM1From real comments

Verdict distilled from 38 mentions across 13 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment56%
PROS 56%
CONS 44%

Rank based on 38 mentions across 13 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You claw or palm grip and want a supportive, curvy shape
  • You value strong grip texture even with sweaty or dry hands
  • You want a sturdy, well-built mouse with satisfying clicks

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You have small hands or dislike wider, curvier shapes
  • You're bothered by fingerprint-prone coating or a stiff stock cable
  • You need polished, reliable companion software

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Mid
Free-spinning hyperscroll wheelLong-term durabilityErgonomic comfortSwitch double-click failurePrice concernsCable and rubber wear
Free-spinning hyperscroll wheel
Long-term durability
Ergonomic comfort
Switch double-click failure
Price concerns
Cable and rubber wear
2Budget
Comfortable shape for large hands
Comfortable shape for large hands
3Mid
Long-term durabilityErgonomic comfortCustomizable extra buttonsSwitch double-click failuresHeavier weight for some usersPrice
Long-term durability
Ergonomic comfort
Customizable extra buttons
Switch double-click failures
Heavier weight for some users
Price
4Mid
Accurate sensor tracking
Accurate sensor tracking
5Mid
Long-term durabilityHyperscroll wheelProgrammable buttons and macrosSwitch failure causing double-clickingRubber grip and cable wearHeavier weight not for everyone
Long-term durability
Hyperscroll wheel
Programmable buttons and macros
Switch failure causing double-clicking
Rubber grip and cable wear
Heavier weight not for everyone
6Premium
Customizable swappable button plates
Customizable swappable button plates
7
Highly Moddable for Extra Weight SavingsFamiliar, Comfortable G305 ShapeTrusted by Repeat Logitech BuyersFront-Heavy or Backward-Shifted BalanceNo Classic Logitech Gaming SoftwareSquishy Colored Variants
Highly Moddable for Extra Weight Savings
Familiar, Comfortable G305 Shape
Trusted by Repeat Logitech Buyers
Front-Heavy or Backward-Shifted Balance
No Classic Logitech Gaming Software
Squishy Colored Variants
8Mid
Comfortable X2H-based shapeGrippy, easy-clean coating
Comfortable X2H-based shape
Grippy, easy-clean coating
Best value
9Budget
Comfortable, versatile shapeGreat value for the priceLightweight, especially with modsSwitches fail over timeBuild quality complaintsNo manual polling rate switch
Comfortable, versatile shape
Great value for the price
Lightweight, especially with mods
Switches fail over time
Build quality complaints
No manual polling rate switch
10Mid
Swappable AA/AAA batteryComfortable shapeWeight is a non-issue for manyHigh priceBuild quality issuesWeight and balance complaints
Swappable AA/AAA battery
Comfortable shape
Weight is a non-issue for many
High price
Build quality issues
Weight and balance complaints
You are here
31Mid
Endgame Gear XM1
Loved shape for claw/palm gripImproved cable and feet in later batchesLightweight for its sizeFit issues for some hand sizes/shapesFrequent stock shortagesWeak or confusing software
Endgame Gear XM1
Loved shape for claw/palm grip
Improved cable and feet in later batches
Lightweight for its size
Fit issues for some hand sizes/shapes
Frequent stock shortages
Weak or confusing software

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

The shape wins people over almost instantly. Multiple users describe falling in love with the XM1's shape within days, calling it their best mouse for claw or palm grip and ditching previous mice like the Model O, GPW, or Sensei. The hump placement and side curves get specific praise for supporting the palm and ring finger, though a few with wider or narrower hands found the fit awkward or too curvy on the right side.

Grip and build quality feel premium to most. Commenters repeatedly note the grip texture stays effective even with sweaty or dry hands, and the shell feels sturdy without rattling. Clicks are described as loud but satisfying, with a 'thoc' or hollow sound some enjoy and others find hurts fast one-tapping. Early units had a stiffer rubber cable, later replaced with a softer paracord-style cable and improved feet in updated batches.

Software and reliability draw the sharpest criticism. Several users struggle to find or change polling rate settings, calling the software confusing, beta-quality, or simply bad. A handful report double-click, ghosting, or buttons briefly cutting out during sustained fire, while others say a month or more of use showed zero issues. Stock shortages are also a recurring frustration for buyers wanting a second unit.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?