Verdict distilled from 1 mentions across 1 aspects in comments under product review videos.
Positive sentiment100%
PROS 100%
Rank based on 1 mentions across 1 aspects
View the verdict as
What users lovefavorite_border
graphic_eqBalances Precision and Musicalityexpand_more0 mentions
One commenter compared the DPA 4006A directly against the Neumann TLM 170 and KM 183, finding it combined the technical precision of the 170 with the musicality and airy resonance of the 183. This suggests the 4006A can offer a well-rounded tonal character in a mic shootout context.
High Owner SatisfactionExceptional Sound ClarityGreat for Field RecordingHigh PriceNot Omnidirectional / More MuffledUltrasonic Self-Noise & Wind Rumble
Post-recording pattern flexibilityVersatile across instrumentsStrong, non-boomy low endPrice barrier for some buyersUnclear M/S and connector design questionsLacking low-mid presence on some vocals
Strong overall sound qualityVersatile onboard EQ switchesBuilt-in gain boostHigh price for some buyersUncertain added value over existing setupFiddly dip switches
Smoother, clearer vocal sound than SM58/SM57Excellent on acoustic guitarDurable, long-lasting buildCan sound harsh in some applicationsAppearance not universally likedInconsistent noise rejection vs SM57
Smooth, warm characterCompetitive with top-tier micsFull-bodied, rich low endHard to distinguish from cheaper alternativesVery high pricePositioning-sensitive
The DPA 4006A appears in shootout videos alongside the Neumann TLM 170 and KM 183 on piano, and in a classical guitar tone test. One listener felt the DPA 4006A combined the best of both Neumann mics, describing it as pairing the technical precision of the TLM 170 with the musicality and airy resonance of the KM 183. Viewers have also shown interest in how it might compare to vintage options like the Neumann KM54 on steel-string guitar, though no direct comparison is confirmed in the comments. Some ask whether a single 4006A, rather than a stereo pair, could work for fingerstyle guitar recording. Others want clarification on which grid setting - close, free, or diffuse field - was used during the piano test.
Outdated / Not-accurate data?
graphic_eqBalances Precision and Musicality
1 mentions
Widely praised
One commenter compared the DPA 4006A directly against the Neumann TLM 170 and KM 183, finding it combined the technical precision of the 170 with the musicality and airy resonance of the 183. This suggests the 4006A can offer a well-rounded tonal character in a mic shootout context.
@ertatta
I was surprised to find out that I preferred the 183 being that it had a more colorful, resonant, & airy presentation. To me, B&K/DPA combined the best of the 2 previous mics, the technical precision of the 170 & the musicality of the 183.\nI’d like Schoeps MK2/2H & sennheiser mkh 8020 thrown in for comparison.launch