AKG K702 65th Anniversary EditionFrom real comments

Verdict distilled from 28 mentions across 10 aspects in comments under product review videos.

Positive sentiment37%
PROS 37%
CONS 63%

Rank based on 28 mentions across 10 aspects

View the verdict as

Buy this if...

  • You want the classic K702/Q701 sound signature with a more comfortable, ridge-free headband
  • You already own or plan to invest in a proper amp and source, since these are demanding to drive
  • You prefer the anniversary edition's color scheme over the standard K701/Q701 look

What users love

Skip this if...

  • You're only after sound quality and can buy a cheaper standard K702 or Q701 with identical sonics
  • You need headphones for mobile or unamplified listening, since the open-back design needs serious amplification
  • You're not willing to pay $649+ just for a recolour and headband tweak over a $250-350 alternative

What users complain about

Compare in seconds

Based on user comments

Best choice
1Premium
Apple AirPods Pro 2
Transparency ModeNoise CancellationSound QualityiOS/Apple Ecosystem Lock-inDurability/Crackling ConcernsHigh Price
Apple AirPods Pro 2
Transparency Mode
Noise Cancellation
Sound Quality
iOS/Apple Ecosystem Lock-in
Durability/Crackling Concerns
High Price
2Mid
Skullcandy Crusher
Signature haptic bass slider
Skullcandy Crusher
Signature haptic bass slider
3Premium
Sennheiser HD 490 Pro
Exceptional comfortStrong for gaming and imagingImprovement over HD 650/6XXIrritating L/R lettering inside padsBuild/pad quality issues reportedHigh price relative to alternatives
Sennheiser HD 490 Pro
Exceptional comfort
Strong for gaming and imaging
Improvement over HD 650/6XX
Irritating L/R lettering inside pads
Build/pad quality issues reported
High price relative to alternatives
4Mid
Sennheiser HD 25
Exceptional durabilityBalanced, quality soundFully repairable/modularCable-to-driver cutout issuesStrong clamping forceUnconventional cable entry side
Sennheiser HD 25
Exceptional durability
Balanced, quality sound
Fully repairable/modular
Cable-to-driver cutout issues
Strong clamping force
Unconventional cable entry side
5Mid
Philips SHP9500S
Exceptional comfort
Philips SHP9500S
Exceptional comfort
Best value
6Premium
Denon AH-D9200
Smooth, detailed treble and clarityStrong perceived value and end-game satisfactionTight, deep bassHigh price pointSibilant or fatiguing treble for sensitive earsTight fit for larger ears
Denon AH-D9200
Smooth, detailed treble and clarity
Strong perceived value and end-game satisfaction
Tight, deep bass
High price point
Sibilant or fatiguing treble for sensitive ears
Tight fit for larger ears
7Premium
Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones 700
Excellent Call and Mic QualityAll-Day ComfortIndustry-Leading Noise CancellationHigh Price PointInconsistent Call Clarity in Certain EnvironmentsBluetooth Pairing Problems
Bose Noise Cancelling Headphones 700
Excellent Call and Mic Quality
All-Day Comfort
Industry-Leading Noise Cancellation
High Price Point
Inconsistent Call Clarity in Certain Environments
Bluetooth Pairing Problems
8Premium
Shure SRH1540
Neutral, accurate soundExceptional comfortGreat detail and resolutionPerceived as 'boring' by some listenersElevated mid-bass/sub-bass not fully neutralSound highly dependent on seal and source
Shure SRH1540
Neutral, accurate sound
Exceptional comfort
Great detail and resolution
Perceived as 'boring' by some listeners
Elevated mid-bass/sub-bass not fully neutral
Sound highly dependent on seal and source
9Budget
Philips SHP9500
Exceptional value for moneyOutstanding comfortDetailed, neutral sound signatureLight or rolled-off bassCheap-feeling build qualityPerceived treble grain/sibilance
Philips SHP9500
Exceptional value for money
Outstanding comfort
Detailed, neutral sound signature
Light or rolled-off bass
Cheap-feeling build quality
Perceived treble grain/sibilance
10Budget
Apple EarPods
Excellent Sound Quality for PriceComfortable for Extended UseNo Charging RequiredLimited Noise IsolationBuild Quality ConcernsNot Secure for Active Use
Apple EarPods
Excellent Sound Quality for Price
Comfortable for Extended Use
No Charging Required
Limited Noise Isolation
Build Quality Concerns
Not Secure for Active Use
You are here
31Premium
AKG K702 65th Anniversary Edition
Reference-level sound qualityImproved smooth headbandAttractive color schemeHigh price for minimal changesDemanding amplification requirementsSame sound as cheaper models
AKG K702 65th Anniversary Edition
Reference-level sound quality
Improved smooth headband
Attractive color scheme
High price for minimal changes
Demanding amplification requirements
Same sound as cheaper models

Who wins on what

Ranked by what users actually praise

Overall Impression

Many commenters feel the 65th Anniversary is just a repainted K702 at an inflated price. Multiple viewers point out that the K702 65th Anniversary appears identical in sound to the standard K702 or Q701, yet costs significantly more, with figures of $649-650 versus $250-350 for the older models. Several call this a 'rip off' or question whether AKG is 'insane' for the pricing, viewing the change as largely cosmetic recolouring rather than a meaningful upgrade justifying the premium.

The redesigned smooth headband is the standout, universally praised improvement. Long-time K701/Q701 owners repeatedly highlight that AKG finally removed the uncomfortable ridges from the headband, calling it a 'HUGE plus' and joking it 'only took 7 or 8 years.' One commenter even planned to source replacement headbands from AKG to retrofit their older Q701 pair, showing how significant this comfort fix was seen to be within the K702 line's history.

Sound quality is reference-level but demanding, requiring proper amplification to shine. Commenters describe the K702 as an open-back, amp-hungry headphone that performs poorly from weak sources like an iPod's headphone jack, needing a dedicated DAC and amp to deliver its full clarity and damping factor. One long-term owner initially found the sound dull compared to other headphones but grew to appreciate its wide soundstage and spaciousness once properly driven and given time to adjust.

Outdated / Not-accurate data?